Benchmark
#41
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:10 AM
XP Pro
10min 58 sec
pentium 4 3.8ghz
2.0 ghz ram
nvidia quadro FX540
#42
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:44 AM
5 min 45 sec ... both finished within seconds of each other.
dual xeons & dual monitors... dual is good.
#43
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:50 AM
#44
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:53 AM
Windows XP Pro
Pent 4 3.2Ghz
1.5 GB Ram
I think it is that slow b/c of the network we are on.
#45
Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:17 AM
Holy maceral, am I sucking hind teat on this one!! I am offsite using a vpn connection, but still I am surprized how long this took. I have a brandnew hp machine here (2 weeks old)
-Desktop HP compac dx22oo Mt
-Windows XP pro.
-Pentium 4 CPU 3.066
3.06GH and 896 MB Ram
#46
Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:25 AM
Holy macerel, am I sucking hind teat here!I have a brand new machine and am working offsite using a vpn connection but I am still surprised how long this took.
-Desktop HP Compaq dx 2200 MT
-Windows xp prof.
Pentium 4 cpu 3.066
3.06 gh 896 mb ram
#47
Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:44 AM
#48
Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:51 AM
Wow, this sounds like I am dead last? I am working offsite using a vpn connection but I have a brand new machine?
Desktop HP Compaq dx220 MT
Windows xp professional
Pentium 4 cpu 3.066
3.06 gh with 896 mb ram
#49
Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:54 AM
Wow, this sounds like I am dead last? I am working offsite using a vpn connection but I have a brand new machine?
Desktop HP Compaq dx220 MT
Windows xp professional
Pentium 4 cpu 3.066
3.06 gh with 896 mb ram
#50
Posted 24 May 2007 - 11:57 AM
The fact that your 3.2 / 3.4ghz machines are the same speed as a 2.2ghz AMD may be due to having divided your Level 1 cache up to support HT.
IF it is better, let us know. It looks like a LOT of INTEL based systems could benefit if it helps.
#51
Posted 24 May 2007 - 12:02 PM
Time 5 minutes
CPU Intel Core2 E6600
RAM 2Gb
Win XP
#52
Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:14 PM
#53
Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:43 PM
For some reason, the server on the Mcam support site shuts off when the samples are only halfway downloaded.. ??
thanks in advance..
Steve
svp2@netpipe.com
#54
Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:49 PM
System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
System Model: Precision M65 Laptop
Processor: Intel® Core2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory: 2046MB RAM
Card name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
I used to have a M70, but th M65 is much faster as it is dual core.
#55
Posted 24 May 2007 - 03:59 PM
HP nw9440 Mobile Workstation,
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor
T7400, 2.16GHz, with Centrino
Technology, 2GB RAM,
#56
Posted 24 May 2007 - 07:43 PM
Home made (assembled) computer
Intel Duo Core 2.66
Windows XP Pro
2 Gb ram
I guess the new computer was well worth it :-)
#57
Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:54 PM
Dell Precision 390
Intel Core 2 X6800 @ 2.93GHZ
4 Gig of RAM
Nvidia Quadro FX4500
XP Pro SP2
#58
Posted 25 May 2007 - 01:52 AM
Dell Precision 470
Dual Xeons,3.2 GHZ
2GB ram
Windows XP pro
Nvidia Quadro fx1300
#59
Posted 25 May 2007 - 02:37 AM
Dell M60 Laptop
Intel Pentium M processor, 1.7GHz
1.5GB RAM
Quadro FX Go1000 graphics card
Display surface/plane intersections: ON
other aps were running during test
#60
Posted 25 May 2007 - 03:16 AM
Dell M65 notebook
Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GHz
2 GB RAM @ 1.99 GHz
Windows XP
I shut down Outlook, iTunes, and other memory hogs.
In our benchmarks the M70 and M65 are pretty close. Some toolpaths - like Parallel seem to be faster on the M65. They have better graphics cards, so when the toolpath includes showing graphics during the calculations, they are faster on the M65, otherwise equivalent.
Online Stopwatch - http://tools.arantius.com/stopwatch















