Jump to content


* * * * - 6 votes

Benchmark


  • Please log in to reply
1590 replies to this topic

#41 Quickmike

Quickmike

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 315 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:10 AM

Dell  precision workstation 380
XP Pro
10min 58 sec
pentium 4 3.8ghz
2.0 ghz ram
nvidia quadro FX540

#42 jeffl

jeffl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:44 AM

Regened 2 sessions simultaneously at .0001 tolerance on all ops:

5 min 45 sec ... both finished within seconds of each other.

dual xeons & dual monitors... dual is good.

#43 Roger Peterson

Roger Peterson

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • 2,770 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:50 AM

if only someone would make a dual xeon laptop.   biggrin.gif    biggrin.gif

#44 IntegrexMan

IntegrexMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 175 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:53 AM

15 Min 4 Sec
Windows XP Pro
Pent 4 3.2Ghz
1.5 GB Ram

I think it is that slow b/c of the network we are on.

#45 dantheman

dantheman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:17 AM

30 min 50 sec.!
Holy maceral, am I sucking hind teat on this one!! I am offsite using a vpn connection, but still I am surprized how long this took. I have a brandnew hp machine here (2 weeks old)
-Desktop HP compac dx22oo Mt
-Windows XP pro.
-Pentium 4 CPU 3.066
3.06GH and 896 MB Ram

#46 dantheman

dantheman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:25 AM

30 min. 50 sec.!

Holy macerel, am I sucking hind teat here!I have a brand new machine and am working offsite using a vpn connection but I am still surprised how long this took.
-Desktop HP Compaq dx 2200 MT
-Windows xp prof.
Pentium 4 cpu 3.066
3.06 gh 896 mb ram

#47 Ricksterâ„¢

Ricksterâ„¢

    MOBSTERATOR

  • Moderators
  • 12,428 posts
  • Location:Canadada

Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:44 AM

You can say that again!

#48 dantheman

dantheman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:51 AM

30 min and 50 sec.!
Wow, this sounds like I am dead last? I am working offsite using a vpn connection but I have a brand new machine?
Desktop HP Compaq dx220 MT
Windows xp professional
Pentium 4 cpu 3.066
3.06 gh with 896 mb ram

#49 dantheman

dantheman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:54 AM

30 min and 50 sec.!
Wow, this sounds like I am dead last? I am working offsite using a vpn connection but I have a brand new machine?
Desktop HP Compaq dx220 MT
Windows xp professional
Pentium 4 cpu 3.066
3.06 gh with 896 mb ram

#50 Craig Madsen from CM3D

Craig Madsen from CM3D

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,990 posts
  • Location:Rigby, ID

Posted 24 May 2007 - 11:57 AM

Just for grins, those with INTEL and HT turned on, try turning Hyperthreading OFF and re-run the test.

The fact that your 3.2 / 3.4ghz machines are the same speed as a 2.2ghz AMD may be due to having divided your Level 1 cache up to support HT.

IF it is better, let us know. It looks like a LOT of INTEL based systems could benefit if it helps.

#51 Gilberto

Gilberto

    Advanced Member

  • Resellers
  • PipPipPip
  • 495 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 12:02 PM

Same part but Metric with same converted tolerance 0.0025mm

Time 5 minutes
CPU Intel Core2 E6600
RAM 2Gb
Win XP

#52 dantheman

dantheman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:14 PM

turned Hyperthreading OFF and it reduced the time from 30 min 50 sec down to 29 min 30 sec. I'm hoping for a 25 minute reduction! Any other sugestions! I guess it must have something to do with the vpn connection?

#53 Steve Hattori

Steve Hattori

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 322 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:43 PM

If someone could send me the file, I'd like try it on an AMD laptop, and an Intel desktop.
For some reason, the server on the Mcam support site shuts off when the samples are only halfway downloaded..  ??

thanks in advance..

Steve
svp2@netpipe.com

#54 Glenn Bouman

Glenn Bouman

    Advanced Member

  • In-House Solutions
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,550 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:49 PM

9.5 minutes

System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
       System Model: Precision M65 Laptop                  
           Processor: Intel® Core™2 CPU         T7200  @ 2.00GHz (2 CPUs)
             Memory: 2046MB RAM

        Card name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
     Manufacturer: NVIDIA

I used to have a M70, but th M65 is much faster as it is dual core.

#55 connormac

connormac

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,137 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 03:59 PM

7min 59 sec

HP nw9440 Mobile Workstation,
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor
T7400, 2.16GHz, with Centrino
Technology, 2GB RAM,

#56 Bob Wolcott

Bob Wolcott

    Advanced Member

  • eMC Learning Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,158 posts

Posted 24 May 2007 - 07:43 PM

6 min 40 sec

Home made (assembled) computer
Intel Duo Core 2.66
Windows XP Pro
2 Gb ram

I guess the new computer was well worth it :-)

#57 Kyle Waters

Kyle Waters

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Location:Brighton, Michigan

Posted 24 May 2007 - 09:54 PM

6 min 7 sec

Dell Precision 390
Intel Core 2 X6800 @ 2.93GHZ
4 Gig of RAM
Nvidia Quadro FX4500
XP Pro SP2

#58 Rob_Bish

Rob_Bish

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 94 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 May 2007 - 01:52 AM

9 MIN 05 SEC

Dell Precision 470

Dual Xeons,3.2 GHZ

2GB ram

Windows XP pro

Nvidia Quadro fx1300

#59 Bryan Johnson

Bryan Johnson

    Advanced Member

  • Resellers
  • PipPipPip
  • 995 posts
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 25 May 2007 - 02:37 AM

14min 30sec

Dell M60 Laptop
Intel Pentium M processor, 1.7GHz
1.5GB RAM
Quadro FX Go1000 graphics card
Display surface/plane intersections: ON

other aps were running during test

#60 Allan Brown

Allan Brown

    Advanced Member

  • In-House Solutions
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,168 posts

Posted 25 May 2007 - 03:16 AM

9:02

Dell M65 notebook
Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GHz
2 GB RAM @ 1.99 GHz

Windows XP

I shut down Outlook, iTunes, and other memory hogs.

In our benchmarks the M70 and M65 are pretty close.  Some toolpaths - like Parallel seem to be faster on the M65.  They have better graphics cards, so when the toolpath includes showing graphics during the calculations, they are faster on the M65, otherwise equivalent.

Online Stopwatch - http://tools.arantius.com/stopwatch