Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

New CNC machinist here. I have a question on work offsets and how to make it so that my HAAS machine mills out evenly from the stock. I have a program to machine a small rectangle (1.77" x 1.16" x .25") from a piece of stock measuring 2" x 1.5" x .5". I have probed the piece of stock in the machine with the "rectangular block" function numerous times, ""outside corner" and even tried to separately probe each "individual surface" as well. I'm a bit lost on how to accomplish this and have even sides so that I can flip the part and finish it. Anyone on here able to give some advice? TIA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The probing cycles that I have attempted to use are the rectangular block, single surface, and outside corner. It probes just fine and outputs work offsets in x,y, and z. I'm using mastercam 2023 and the g54 listed in the program is X-.3948 Y-1.27. Hopefully that helps some with explaining my issue, but I am new to CNC work and am probably not answering that the best. My apologies

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
On 2/3/2023 at 6:18 AM, Leon82 said:

personally i don't like negative depth facing. if the next time the stock is different it could wipe the jaw out or make the part ull. I would set off the bottom and start with the shortest piece

I was taught by cranky old machinists to always make my Z zero the face of the part, thus all negative numbers are cuts and all positive numbers are clearance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2023 at 4:21 AM, jpatry said:

I was taught by cranky old machinists to always make my Z zero the face of the part, thus all negative numbers are cuts and all positive numbers are clearance.

I was taught the same. Nothing like doing a bunch of math on parts with more than one depth cut. :rolleyes:

Only thing worse is people that set their machines up so + is - and - is +. I think I read something about this in Revelations or something so I try to avoid it. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2023 at 4:21 AM, jpatry said:

I was taught by cranky old machinists to always make my Z zero the face of the part, thus all negative numbers are cuts and all positive numbers are clearance.

I was also taught this way and did so for many years. I now set zero to solid jaw, stop and bottom of stock.

Reason is my vise with stop setup is dedicated so when I run part xyz then load part xxx or part yyy zero is already set. with verification ability these days I dont generally look at the code cept to verify tap cycle, feed speed tool number etc. no xyz for me machine fly's through that too fast. me programmer is 99% on and 100% after the first cut. always deck top first and sneak that in then let er rip

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Guest flatcalmproduction

I agree, using the center of the stock for X & Y is a great way to get the even/centered result chriswlbr94 is after.

I am not up to date with the provided HAAS probe cycles - you will most likely need to create 2 "bore/boss" measuring cycles to set your offset.

Where Z is set... there have been good points to set it on the top or the bottom. The challenge to this is if you want the finished part centered in Z. There will be more math involved in the probe cycle; and knowing where the lowest point of the material (bottom of the block/top of the seating surface) can be helpful for calculating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
On 4/17/2023 at 8:58 AM, Jobnt said:

Only thing worse is people that set their machines up so + is - and - is +

The other one that makes my eye twitch is when people use tool length offsets calculated from machine zero, and leave the WPC Z at machine zero to make it all work.

Actually, wait, I just remembered something perhaps even more cursed, I was told, that by switching the control tool offset mode from radius to diameter that it would "make the machine twice as accurate".

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 8/27/2023 at 2:48 AM, jpatry said:

I was told, that by switching the control tool offset mode from radius to diameter that it would "make the machine twice as accurate".

Technically you could program it more accurately, but the machine will still do what the machine will do. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...