Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Okuma ID thread turning critique


Recommended Posts

G97S578M03M41
G0X.2653Z.3078
G71X.5013Z-.6B29D.0063H.036M32M75F.0357

doing a 1/2-28 ID thread with a little micro100 solid tool.

sucker is taking over 30 passes:blink:. With only .015" depth of thread this seems ridiculous although it is working well on the machine.

 going to be switching to 17-4 stainless @35Rc next week. How many passes should it take in the experience of some turning experts here?

thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.01 depth of cut is a very safe starting point for 1/2 threads. Which i believe would be a "D.02" since okuma lathes use diameter instead of radius. It also looks like in your program that your starting the first cut at x.2653. This Should be the minor diameter of the thread. Check when your threader is actually cutting in X. I'm guessing there is a lot of air passes.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

ok, changed start point to X.430 from original X.265. Didn't make a bit of difference on ridiculous number of passes or the fact that the first pass took a chip.

part chattered for the first 15 passed followed by no noise (broke the tip off).

Going to shorten the stock stick out by an inch which is significant for Ø1.0" stock in hope of eliminating chatter.

seems like all those passes are just work hardening the material. I'll try D.02 on my next threading tool, and see....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using M32 which according to the manual will infeed along the angle of the thread, thus all of the wear will be on the leading edge of the tool. anybody notice better wear by switching to M33 which supposedly does a zig zag infeed on successive passes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, mkd said:

I've been using M32 which according to the manual will infeed along the angle of the thread, thus all of the wear will be on the leading edge of the tool. anybody notice better wear by switching to M33 which supposedly does a zig zag infeed on successive passes?

I always used that process to get even wear on my threading inserts.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OH man! blew the tip off on first part .......again!

 I was real careful to setup the face angle of the bar to be ever so slightly negative rake to ensure i'm not rubbing with the back.... and still blammo.

More negative front rake angle?

anybody got a favorite tool for .500 threads? would an insert be better?

TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, live tool, Y/B axis actually.

 In retrospect the problem was probably the goofy boring bar setup I was using leaving some irregularities in the bore. Multiple problems actually. . This what i get for trying to "force" a machine into production while programming a mill/turn. FACEPALM.

 any ways gotta put my pet project aside and run some real parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...