Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

MCAM 2020 Raster question


Millertime
 Share

Recommended Posts

Using Mastercam 2020 Tool path is Highspeed Raster. When I select all  machining surfaces and set my stock to leave  (.010 on floors .010 on walls) For avoidance I have 3 surfaces selected (my fixture ) floor and wall stock is set to zero .  Run verify and backplot and toolpath is going to zero on all machining surfaces !! Been out of the loop on this forum for quite some time not sure if this is a glitch with this version.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Avoidance geometry can cause Raster to do funny things in my experience.  If you have to use it, I've had the best luck setting my stock to leave pretty close.  So if you're leaving .01" on your machining geometry, leave .011" on your avoidance (I make the difference only .0001" between the two, but I also program at .0001" tolerance).

 

Otherwise I prefer to control raster using a containment boundary.  The new silhouette boundary functionality is very helpful for lots of geometric conditions.  I generally find myself using the silhouette instead of a solid edge.  Usually if silhouette containment won't work, I usually end up drawing in a containment boundary.

 

If you're able to post a file or even a picture of the part I could try to help you out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feed back . Played with the setting a bit more to see if there was something else that would be causing this and found that if I have tool contact point checked in the tool containment params tool path will cut to zero regardless of how much stock I leave. Change it to tip and stock to leave values are recognized. I think this might be file specific since I imported the operation into another file Selected dives and avoidance geometry and toolpath verified correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Millertime said:

Thanks for the feed back . Played with the setting a bit more to see if there was something else that would be causing this and found that if I have tool contact point checked in the tool containment params tool path will cut to zero regardless of how much stock I leave. Change it to tip and stock to leave values are recognized. I think this might be file specific since I imported the operation into another file Selected dives and avoidance geometry and toolpath verified correctly.

Interesting, I'll have to keep an eye out for that.  I usually contain the tip of the cutter because sometimes things go haywire when trying to use contact point in steep areas.  

  • Huh? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...