You only had the top face of the model selected in your initial stock settings. TEST STOCK MODEL.mcam

I modified one of the templates for the mill operations to include the length offset and the diameter offset. Save the original file before copying the new file to the SST directory Use this as an example and tweak it for you own use -OP Tool List (OPERATION-M) short.rpx

It's only right if you read it in the voice of the French Narrator from spongebob.

Question 1: Do you mean Quick Verify? Question 2: A couple of little problems that are slipping you up. The first is your Stock Model is set to start from a model, but the model that you chose is only the top face of Op#1 so just select the entire model. Second problem is that Level 1 was still visible, so it turn off level 1. Edits: Looks like JB780 beat me, and I can't embed images here anymore. . Two failures!

I'm curious as to why the tool numbers in the librarymatter, unless you're doing a couple of pretty specific things... You can set it up so that tools load sequentially....this negates needing to number them in a library.. Now, if you're setting up standardized carousel tooling, that's a different thing and would require saved tools numbers...in this case, I will make an empty Mastercam file with those tools in it...I use that as a "seed" file and import any parts into it, then do a "Save As" I have a library that I draw on that has 1,000+ tools...as we use Mazak Tool life, they are saved with T#'s such as 11010500 for a .500 F-endmill...in those case I do not use the add sequential option

They can add groups to the new Machine dialog, but not to Levels or Planes.

Got this in my email this morning https://youtu.be/1iPY-Gab6YE

After watching this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUdpPwQin4s Rather incomplete product by the sounds of things

Still wish they wouldn't take some of the simple way of doing things away. I get the direction they are headed but..... It would be easy for them to just incorporate the stock setup from 2022 IMO .

Yes, let me work on that. Thanks

Might try to open up the tolerance.... It will change to computations ....

Aaron, I've gotta take a win when I get it! You pro's have helped me so much on here, I figure I'll try to take care of the easy ones when I can! lol Not that I've seen, but that doesn't mean there's not something I dunno about.

LOL. I do like how this forum has the little "16 years later" note above the reply. :-)

You do realize this thread is 17 years old?

can you email me one too please lol [email protected]