Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Jaz

Verified Members
  • Posts

    312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jaz

  1. The exploding file occasionally happens to me, this does not appear to be the case. Until today, today the file is exploding. It may just be a corrupted solid that is impossible to dispose of, that has happened before.
  2. Nothing in groups, I am in the habit of keeping them cleaned up.
  3. I am working over a network. Moving the file to local drive has no noticeable affect. SSD drives. Video card is Quadro M6000, delays do not appear to be related to graphics. In task manager nothing is being maxed, CPU runs at 5%. Running multiple sessions, Vericut and/or CATIA has no noticeable affect on this MC issue. Actual toolpath processing is not unacceptable, but just opening and closing toolpath parameters takes several minutes and moving or deleting geometry can take 20 minutes even if it is not associated with anything. The more toolpaths in the file the worse it gets, during the creation of the 1st couple hundred toolpaths performance is acceptable. Deleting all the toolpaths in a file restores SOME of the response times, deleting all the toolpaths can take several hours.
  4. More information: This does not appear to be related to the file size. I deleted all solids, including drive geometry. Reloaded file which is now 232,341 KB. Still takes minutes to open a toolpath parameter or to move a piece of geometry even if it is not associated with anything. Any chance this has something to do with Tracking Changes? it appears I have that function turned off but I don't know how it works.
  5. Not processing toolpaths, necessarily. Anything I do, like delete or move geometry or open parameters for a toolpath. And opening a file takes like 5 minutes.
  6. When a part gets to about 300,000Kb file size it gets painfully slow to do anything. Are there settings I can change in MC or Windows I can change to make it run faster? Running MC2022
  7. Exactly what I am seeing. If I copy and paste anything from the file it comes with 150,000KB of invisible baggage Deleting everything does not delete the invisible baggage I am looking through the file to see if I can find an evil solid, no luck so far At this point my work around is to not use anything from the bad files, which is a bit of extra work to re-model some fixtures and stuff from scratch
  8. But I am deleting almost everything in the file, including most solids.
  9. No groups I should remove the history before I delete a solid?
  10. Delete all machine and toolpath groups?
  11. Has something to do with copy and paste. Whenever I copy any entity from one of those files and paste it, it comes with a large amount of baggage of some sort that I can't see. File repair does nothing
  12. Running MC2022 I have a part file that has grown to about 190,000 MB so when I began programming fixtures for the part I saved as a new file and deleted everything except the fixture geometry. When I saved it it grew to 220,000MB. So I went back in and deleted more stuff. When I saved it had grown to 360,000MB. So I deleted everything except 2 lines. It is now 330,000MD. What is happening and how can I fix it? I cannot share the file.
  13. No, that's not it. It used to work. I guess it's broken now.
  14. When I drive a simple contour with several chains and try to set the cut order of the depth cuts to "By depth" the retract between cuts is very high (like 500") no matter what settings for a clearance plane I set. What am I missing? Running MC2019
  15. Still no joy. For now I will move on to work arounds
  16. I spoke too soon. Doesn't work in MC2020. I am installing 2021 to see if that makes a difference.
  17. Crazy, you are a genius! Thank you
  18. That check box does other things, but doesn't affect the retract. I am using lines to drive the toolpath. I tried using the arcs but that had other issues. I will see about posting a file
  19. It backplots just like that. Clearance is locked on incremental because this is a 5 axis toolpath. Using safety zone gets it to retract, but since the toolpath is on the inside of a cylinder the retract zone is not ideal.
  20. When I drive 5 axis helix bores I get no retract between holes, just rapids from the bottom of the helix to the clearance for the next hole. What am I missing? (MC2020)
  21. Remove history might work, it will be hard to know which of the 825 solids need it. I am in the habit of keeping the temp folder clean, reopening MasterCam has no affect. This only occurs 1/2 the time and does not seem to affect the usability of the saved file.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...