Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

CristiP

Verified Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About CristiP

  • Birthday 11/04/1986

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Uncategorized

  • Location
    Romania

Recent Profile Visitors

939 profile views

CristiP's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. I uploaded 2 pictures. One is with the old #19700's and one is with the error I've found. To the old #19700's parameter I added the errors #564 to X, #565 to Y and #566 to Z I don't know from where are the errors. Yesterday I updated the COR and this morning after warming up the machine for 1h I've checked the COR again and they were no bigger than 0.003mm. The only thing I know is something about the machine being leveled at the begining of the year. This was done by Matsuura and I think they adjusted the COR after that...because the only thing I did now to update the COR is probing the artefact. Matsuura machines they have an artefact you can probe to track the machine movement and of course easy update the COR numbers. This artefact must be in relation to COR and I hope it is. I uploaded also a picture with some information related to the artefact. Thanks
  2. Yes I know. I don't know when the machine kinematics was checked last time as I'm not usually working on this machine. I decided to check it after a not so good cmm report. We are using G68.2 and G43.4. Thanks
  3. Matsuura mam100 5 axis machine table/table
  4. Will updating the COR affect the tool lengths? Thank you for your time.
  5. I don't know if Mastercam has this function but I know for sure Powermill does and yes it is nice to have it.
  6. You have to create and use an angle head.
  7. Lets you set an additional start and end margin to overcome surface edge inaccuracies.
  8. Has to be done from the position the 3d model is saved, with a lollipop cutter.
  9. Hello, I have to deburr this holes intersection and I can't do it right. Please look at the attached dropbox link for a picture. I also attached the 3d model. I need help here, please. Thank you very much. tesire 3d.STEP https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ptwc4yhdw4w33e/PIC%201.PNG?dl=0
  10. I understand about using the right toolpath for the job and I agree with all of you, but it was just a case regarding this problem. Thanks
  11. thank you : ) looks good!
  12. ok, but you have only 4 drive surfaces and you need 5 in order to machine all the cavity. You did not select the outer most surface, the yellow one from the below picture. If I do the same the toolpath is also ok like in your picture, but if you select a boundary and you choose stay inside -0.2 to keep the tool like in the below position you will see that your results are different.
  13. recently I programmed some big parts 80% made by NURBS surfaces. "Legacy" toolpaths took a lot of time to calculate the toolpath but the HST were 70% faster.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...