Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

KORLOY

Verified Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

1,289 profile views

KORLOY's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. Hi guys! I have a problem while posting programs for our 5 axis Okuma 5000V. Sometimes, when I post couple operations of the same tool, in operation change it post with A90 (POSITIVE direction - table rotates from the operator) which is not comfortable and safe to work. It post like this even when I'm forcing it thru misc values (mi10). Same thing happens when I'm transforming operation (by rotation) - in some angles it can post positive. But it never happens in the beginning of the program and with force tool change ON in operations. My vector section in the post looks like this: What do think, why it sometimes rotate positive? Thank you for your thoughts!
  2. Hi guys! Yes I'm running CALL OO88 from the post and it works fine for 3+2 applications (there is no need for G169/TCPC at the moment). And I'm wondering what changes to do in the post to make it work for the new machine. I have open post from HAAS UMC 750 - I will try to copy some logic from that post. Is there enough to change post in the vector section or I have to change something in the machine definition manager? Thank You for the answers guys! Best regards!
  3. Hello guys! We bought new Okuma mu4000v and I need to make some changes in my postprocessor. I have post for our mu5000v which works fine and I want to set up this post for new machine. Main differences of those machines is trunnion position according to XY axis. I'm adding some photos to make it clear. Is there enough to change only vector section of the post (added the photo) or is there something else? For MU5000v vector section in the post looks like this: Thank you for the answers guys!!
  4. Hello guys! I need the recommendations how to set up PC and MC for proper work. I just don't have no more patience with Mastercam calculation times, it's just too long. Even small and not really complex parts/surfaces/stock model creation takes lot of time for calculation. The PC itself is a BOMB: Intel Xeon E5-2667v3, 8x3.2GHz 20MB Cache 3.6 GHz Turbo, 135W, Hyper Threading 32GB RAM NVidia Quadro K4200, 4GB 1.2 TB SSD Intel S3500 500GB HDD Windows 10 pro Hyper threading and all cores are enabled in BIOS Memory buffering is set to 85% in MC system: During calculation Task manager shows that ONLY ONE CORE of CPU IS WORKING at HIGHER INTENSITY while average load on the system is only 5%. Why is that and how to activate other seven(+8 virtual) CORES of CPU? Where the problem can be, what other settings I need to change to get best performance? I am wondering what PC is necessary for really big and complex parts to program with Mastercam? Waiting for your thoughts and answers! Kind Regards
  5. remove this topic
  6. Hello guys, I need some advice how to solve this. The situation is following: After deep hole drilling with long carbide TSC drill I need to finish my hole with longer HSS drill (on intersecting holes and etc.). When I use standart G83 Cycle it start's on R plane which is retract point, what I need is to start first peck deep in a hole ant retract to R plane (for normal chip removal). How did you guys solved this? Maybe somebody created custom cycle on your control? Now I'm solving this with transforming 3D contour operation (getting the bunch of coordinates for drilling). The photo is for better understanding: Thank you for any advises guys!
  7. Hello guys, I need some advice how to solve this. The situation is following: After deep hole drilling with long carbide TSC drill I need to finish my hole with longer HSS drill (on intersecting holes and etc.). When I use standart G83 Cycle it start's on R plane which is retract point, what I need is to start first peck deep in a hole ant retract to R plane (for normal chip removal). How did you guys solved this? Maybe somebody created custom cycle on your control? Now I'm solving this with transforming 3D contour operation (getting the bunch of coordinates for drilling). The photo is for better understanding: Thank you for any advises guys!
  8. Hello guys, I need some advice how to solve this. The situation is following: After deep hole drilling with long carbide TSC drill I need to finish my hole with longer HSS drill (on intersecting holes and etc.). When I use standart G83 Cycle it start's on R plane which is retract point, what I need is to start first peck deep in a hole ant retract to R plane (for normal chip removal). How did you guys solved this? Maybe somebody created custom cycle on your control? Now I'm solving this with transforming 3D contour operation (getting the bunch of coordinates for drilling). The photo is for better understanding: Thank you for any advises guys!
  9. Thank you a lot!!!! worked!!! By the way I commented---> #!op_id$ before this check, you can see it in the photo I attached if someone will need this in the future
  10. Thank you Jeff, Colin and jlw™ . I made everything like you guys said (made a check - if op_id$ <> prv_op_id$, and updated "!op_id$") but it causing an error Where the problem is?
  11. I tried your method "JLW" but it didnt worked, it's still posting N on EVERY RETRACT Program looks like this : As you can see I manage to get correct N on the Start at the program and at ptlchg$ (#Tool change), but at ptlchg0$ (tool number repeats) It's not working like I prefer. Here is a post segment: By the way, why pspindchng is working great? It changes only ONE time with retract to second block. I'm so close to get result that I want , than my N will perfectly match X+ setup sheet! Thank you!
  12. Hi guys and "So not a Guru"! I have absolutely same problem - I can't solve my op_num output on every retract. So how you solve the problem? I played with If op_num <> prv_op_num & omitseq$ = 1 & tseqno > 0, pdosomething. like Colin said, but didn't worked for me. So, n$=op_num pbld, n$*, e$ added in the ptlchg0$ postblock is causing op_num output on every retract, what logic I need to add in this postblock to get correct op_num output)?? Thanks for the answers!
  13. Hi guys! I have the similar problem like Brandon, I'm trying to setup the generic SODICK MARK_30 4X WIRE.PST for our EDM WIRE machine wire LN1W control. At the moment we are using HeartNC programming software and it post correct HEADER at the start of the program I mean: ( = ON OFF IP HRP MAO SV V SF C PIK CTRL WK WT WS WP); C000 = 010 016 2215 000 360 040 8 0015 0 000 0000 025 160 150 050; C001 = 012 016 2215 000 364 025 8 0015 0 000 0000 025 160 150 060; C002 = 003 018 2215 000 750 045 8 6020 0 000 0000 025 160 150 012; I need the same logic at the MasterCam Post. I have the HeartNC post but the I have no idea how to tie up them together, there is fragment from HeartNC post: # C*** H*** IF(WVV_NC_energy_mode <> WCV_NC_ENG_NOT) LET cnt 1 # /* 加工条件ヘッダー部タイトル */ /* Add by I.Hara '98.03.16 */ LET rtn (FWRITE(outfile, ("( = ON OFF IP HRP MAO SV V SF C PIK CTRL WK WT WS WP);"))) LOOP EXIT_IF(cnt = WVV_PP_c_buf_pos) LET code (GETA("WVS_PP_c_buf", cnt, 0)) LET code (GETNUM(code)) W_get_rec[WVS_MSPEC_DIR + WVS_ECOND_NAME, code] LET codel (STRDLM(WVV_PP_return_value, "=", 2)) # /* 加工条件桁数によりブランク数が異なる */ /* Add by I.Hara '98.03.06 */ IF(WVV_MS_CCOND_FIG = 3) LET rtn (FWRITE(outfile, ("C" + code + " = " + codel + ";"))) ELSE_IF(WVV_MS_CCOND_FIG = 4) LET rtn (FWRITE(outfile, ("C" + code + " = " + codel + ";"))) ELSE LET rtn (FWRITE(outfile, ("C" + code + "=" + codel + ";"))) END_IF LET cnt (cnt + 1) END_LOOP END_IF Any ideas how to make post like this? I know that the company http://www.shopwareinc.com/ are working with setups for Sodick edm wire machines, maybe someone are using database from shopwareinc ? Thank you for any answers!
  14. Hello post gurus! I have a problem with my custom 5 axis post for 5axis table - table vertical Okuma in 3+2 mode. There is no problems when table is positioned (work zero) at A0, but when my table is rotated at -90 (and the work zero is setted up) the problem in angle positioning occurs. What post changes I have to made to solve it? I will be thankful you for any answers!!

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...