Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

nperry

Verified Members
  • Posts

    104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

nperry's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done Rare

Recent Badges

53

Reputation

  1. I should have noted - I don't have these issues with the moduleworks machine simulator. That simulator seems like a little more work on the front end to get set up but it does seem to run okay.
  2. Anyone else have any issues with this? UMC 750 machine simulator on 2021 shows constant machine/machine collision on the sheet metal. Also shows constant tool/workpiece collision on optirough cutter paths. See screenshot. If I open this file in 2022 and run the simulator it seems to better. That's a pain though...figure this should work just fine in 21.
  3. In the "Surface Parameters" page of the Flowline operation you can click on and then use the "Direction" menu to control lead-in and lead-out so you aren't starting on top of the stock.
  4. Local disk > users > public > public documents > shared mastercam 2021 (or whichever version you're using) > common > reports > sst Copy the files I posted into that folder. To access the setup sheet, right click in your toolpath manager and select "setup sheet" option. In the lowest box there is an option for "report templates", make sure that "setup sheet (mill)" is selected.
  5. Simple question - in the planes manager there's a little equal sign button that sets WCS, construction, tool plane ALL to the selected plane. Is there any way to make this button available as a hot key or in the RMB? I've done a little digging but I've got a serious needle-in-a-haystack type thing going over here.
  6. Yes, it does. It took me one job programming a high feed mill with the "suggested radius" to realize it wasn't gonna work out well for the long term. Grab the tool data off the manufacturer website, spin it up or whatever you need to do to get the right geometry, and voila! you've got yourself all the tools for a beautiful optirough that leaves an actually accurate representation of what you've got in the machine on your stock model.
  7. This is exactly what I would've done in the past. I just feel like I'm missing something. Functionality was added to control from contact point, but it doesn't quite work as expected? Or is it just me?
  8. Z2G included. Could I find a different way to do that top chamfer? Yes. Do I want to? No. Seems like a perfect opportunity for a really nice blend path. Maybe someone can look at that and tell me what I'm missing on that path. For whatever reason it won't drop down past a certain depth and I think it's geometry related. In the past I've had to manipulate the geometry to get the path to work nicely, but I figured the addition of "Tool Contact Point" on boundaries would remedy the geometry manipulation issue. Having to do that is tedious and a time suck, so I've largely avoided blend in the past for that reason. I feel like I remember reading somewhere on this forum that someone had largely replaced their use of flowline with blend because it was producing finer results. Wouldn't mind seeing some examples of how others are using blend to expand my use of the path a little bit if anyone is willing to play along. MYSTERY PART.ZIP
  9. Here's the setup sheets I developed for our shop based on preference for X+. Plug 'em in and see how they suit you. Setup Sheet (MILL).rpx -Setup Sheet (MILL-FILE).rpx -Setup Sheet (MILL-OPERATION).rpx -Setup Sheet (MILL-TOOL).rpx -Setup Sheet (MILL-TOOLS).rpx
  10. We don't have a sim for our 4th axis machine, but if I use the generic it gives the same results as verify.
  11. Pardon me if this one is known - or maybe I've got something messed up. Looking at the 4th axis operations on this part, I've got a rotary advanced toolpath and a couple of 5x flow toolpaths both using transform operations. This gets a little convoluted...if I stock model only the original operations it shows a finished tooth in the correct spot. If I stock model all of the operations it shows only one finished tooth, but one tooth rotated over from the original path. So something is weird with that. Then the verify is flat out messed up. The rotary advanced transform operation will verify out cherry, but the 5x flow won't verify even close to correct. I have, however, posted code and it looks good on an independent check. File too large, using dropbox. Just curious if anyone wants to look and can help me see where I'm wrong if it's my fault. https://www.dropbox.com/s/tgdochhcuq3n24y/RH HELICAL ELECTRODE.ZIP?dl=0
  12. I click on groups, it locks up for about 5 minutes, then the window pops up and displays 0 groups.
  13. It's not really a question of methodology, I don't think. Even if I delete every solid in the file, plus all of the cutter paths, I still wind up with a file that's over 1GB. Something happened with the file during some very simple extrude/mirror operations, I think, and although it's not urgent to get to the bottom of, I'm really really curious about it. I forgot to mention until now that using the repair file feature yields no results.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×