Mr Fish, Can u please give me an example for the correct output gcode from my mcam file? Using the correct post Trying to figure it out by myself to edit the post, because the actual move on machine is not correct. I follow your method, and I think the problem is start from line 24. Been tried to edit manually into correct order (g43.4 H... Z...;) but still output wrong move Should it be G43.4? or there is another option? Been on mastercam seat for 5years now, been doing a little change in my postability post. But nearly give up in this case. I'm so curious to figure out the correct output, so i can guess where is the part of my post to be fixed. Don't give me a correct post, just give me a clue (correct gcode output) so i can learn to fixed it by myself. If you please. Thankss

Hi everyone, Today i have a problem that my workpiece is just a little bigger than my table (outside my xy axis travel limit). I know that the contour toolpath can be done with different C-angle in each wireframe section to avoid overtravel move. But what i want to ask : is possible if i just make a single toolpath to solve this travel limit issue? Here is the illustration to make it clear. Pink line is the axis limit. Any solution would be really appreciated. Mcam attached. Thanks in advance! 54304-999.mcam

The solution is only 3D converter

Try to edit the kinematic build of your machine located in C:\User\Public\Documents\SharedMcamXX\YourMachine\YourMachine.xml Just focus on yellow mark. Hope it help.

It works! Thanks

.

What's the best metodh / toolpath used to remove round material like this?

Try to trigger your post with a little A angle. Example A=0.1 I usually do this if I want C output

Btw, good idea

The tilt range are in symmetrical, it said -110/+110. Our J600/5x Variaxis have -120/+90 B-Angle.

Thanks for the advice. I has already had 3 times training to our reseller before. Have another extra training is good, but wouldn't it better if we have a real group or maybe community? I mean that we can have a lot of sharing experience in that group like machining videos, which can inspire us. Job vacancies and selling merchandise are just the opportunity. Because as far as I know, theory and practice are sometimes different. My company just plot 1 programmer only, which are no experience before. I just sometime feels lonely if there is no person who understand our job. Haha But it's ok if we are in different opinion, I just ask if you have a group like that, then kindly invite me to join

Is there any WhatsApp group for machinist/programmer in this forum? I'm just a beginner 5axis programmer and my boss suggest me to learn from the expert here. If u don't mind please accept me in, hope we can share any knowledge that programmer must have. Thanks a lot.

Dear Jwvt88, we face a same problem, especially when I try to migrate from MCam2017 to MCam2018 with a duplicate SST from my 2017. And I'm here in order to find this solution also. As far I know, the "summon-world" of max tool depth (from all operation) were change from 'NCFILE/MIN-Z2' in 2017 to 'NCFILE/MIN-Z-TPLANE-O' in 2018. But, there is some problem where 'MIN-Z-TPLANE-O' show NA when I try to generate a setup sheet in MCam18. In my opinion, MCam17 is better than MCam18 in generate a setup sheet as you n see in attached file below. We have max depth output, but show NA in 2018. Oh,, also please don't hesitate to ask me for the SST if you wants too. Thx be4. 0KH704_b_BottomMachining.pdf

It doesn't work in my Mastercam 2017. I think ActiveReport Designer are default to read the name of post processor used

No u can't. U have to input a new name everytime u create a new pdf file. I want to solve this problem too a years ago, but nothing we can do. I think this problem was in the active reports viewer