Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

G112 with Milling Toolpaths on VTL with X4


JMWorks
 Share

Recommended Posts

I need to mill some 3D surfaces in a part using our live tooled VTL. I tried posting what I had to see the code and it will not output a G112. I have the misc value #4 set to 1 like I have always used. This is on the surface high speed rough and finish waterline toolpaths that it will not work. It will output fine for the contour path I have in the part though. Also noticed some sort of a bug in verify while watching a tool run compared to the toolpath shown in backplot which is unhandy. Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't ever tried using G112 in a surfacing tool path, and I am assuming you don't have a Y axis. Is the work you are doing on the face of the part? According to my post the cuttype needs to equal four (Y axis substitution) or the abs(cuttype) needs to equal two (r/l face cut) in order for the millcc to be set equal to the misc value 4. I would suppose a post for a VTL would be set up in a similar way.

 

When using mill/turn verify and backplot seldom do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian please try a Surface High Speed path. I just tried a normal surface roughing path and was able to output the G112 correctly there so I am thinking that it just does not work with the Surface High Speed paths. I guess I will switch to a normal contour surface path, strange the High Speed paths will not work, I did not notice a difference in the paths just the amount of control I have over it. Thanks for the help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did try the high speed tool path and it would not output the G112.

 

The conditions I explained here are necessary to set the millcc variable to 1 from the misc value, but another set of conditions come into play in order to output the G112 or G107. In the pmillccb post block the cutpos2$ needs to equal one in order to output an G112 and when I ran a high speed tool path the cutpos2$ was always zero.

 

1=Start point, first point on surface, chained contour, etc

 

0=Before start point; reset at each tool change, including null

 

 

So I would say the high speed surface tool paths do not support the G112 or G107 cycles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...