Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

heeler

Verified Members
  • Posts

    524
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by heeler

  1. I got it. You need to change the format statments from this.

    fs2 2 0.4 0.3 #Decimal, absolute, 4/3 place <<<<<<<

    fs2 3 0.4 0.3d #Decimal, delta, 4/3 place <<<<<<<<

    to this

    fs2 2 0.45 0.3 #Decimal, absolute, 4/3 place <<<<<<<

    fs2 3 0.45 0.3d #Decimal, delta, 4/3 place <<<<<<<<

     

    Thanks to all who have helped.

    Glenn

  2. That is how I have it set. I have tried checking and unchecking the Truncate box, but I still get values that are not .0000 or .0005. Is there someplace else that is overriding this in the MPMaster post?

  3. I am trying to tweek the mpmaster post for a faagor control. The faagor wants to have the R-Plane to be output as a Z value, and the Z-Plane or depth to be an I value for example I post this

    quote:

    N116 G99 G82 Z-.0494 Z0. R.19 K1 F20.

    N118X-11.8701Y2.0509

    N120X-10.6203Y2.049

    and I need this

    quote:

    N120 G82 G99 Z.19 I-.0494 K50 F20.

    N122X-11.8701Y2.0509

    N124X-10.6203Y2.049

    The biggest problem I have is getting it to change the Z to an I.

    Thanks

     

    Glenn

     

    P.S. I had to put faagor because ***or looks like this.

  4. John,

     

    The thing that I thought was most interesting for me is that there was no nethasp.ini file in the CimcoEdit folder to begin with, but it was still working fine before we went on the holiday break, updated our maintainence, and got into the new year. So why did it work before with no file, and now needs the file to work???

     

    But as long as it is working the Troops and Generals are biggrin.gifbiggrin.gifbiggrin.gif

     

    Glenn

  5. Ployd,

     

    From the ***or manual,

    Look-Ahead (G51)

    Programming Format is G51 [A] E

     

    A(0-255) Is optional and it defines the percentage of acceleration to be applied. When not programed or programmed with a "0" value the CNC assumes the acceleration value se by machine parameter for each axis.

     

    E(5.5) Maximum contouring error allowed.

     

    We program ours as G51 E.0001 when cutting aluminum. As you see we don't even use the "A". The value is hard coded in our post in the contour control stuff. You could just manually change it at first and see what works best for what you are doing.

     

    HTH

     

    Glenn

  6. I just got off the phone with CNC software tech support, and they had me copy the nethasp.ini file from the mcamX3 folder to the CIMCOEdit5 folder. This worked for me. They also had one more step for a customer for another work around, but they didn't have me try it as this solution seems to be working.

     

    Glenn

  7. I am having this problem now as well. I have been able to use Cimco with the Mastercam net hasp until now. Nothing has changed except for a new year, and updating our mastercam maintainence agreement.

     

    Hope someone can help.

     

    Glenn

  8. Many times I will save the file as a new name, and then just edit the existing geo if possible, then often times, you can just regenerate the tool path. For example say the part is .25" longer than the last part a radius on each corner. You can just transform/translate the arc for the corners, and the line for the end by the .25 and the trim the other lines to the arc. You could also edit the line, change the parameters of it, then move the arcs to the new line location(X isn't as nice for this as 9 was when you could just edit the arc and redifine it as a fillet ect).

     

    HTH

     

    Glenn

  9. quote:

    I would like to output cutter comp on a 2d or 3d toolpath driving tool center on the geometry.

    An option like "compensation type: off w/comp"


    From the help in Mastercam 2D contour

    quote:

    Wear - When this option is selected, Mastercam calculates the compensated tool positions just as if Computer was selected, but also outputs the G41/G42 codes. This lets the operator adjust for tool wear at the control. Enter the difference between the selected tool size and the reground tool size at the control as a negative number

    I think that were is what you want to use as long as your post is setup to use cuttercomp correctly.

     

    HTH

     

    Glenn

  10. quote:

    Trevor, I have never run g code in the machine, only conversational.

    I don't know of a post that will do the conversational stuff. I think that you have to use a modified fanuc post, and use a .cam file extention. We use the protomx3 here with no real problems other than drill cycles which we changed to just post long hand code for.

     

    Hope that clarifies some issues.

     

    Glenn

  11. quote:

    Now the question! Losing the ability to kick a little wear into the tool to clean up the part by running it again is a pretty serious loss. I hate the thought of having to go back and offset geometry by .0005, reverify, repost, regraph and all to make another clean up pass.

     

    Is there a work around that enables tool probe users to get the same effect as if they were able to use wear comp?

    This is the whole purpose for have cutter comp. Reguardless of using full or wear. If you need to comp the tool from the measured/nominal/zero dia. you just adjust the amount of the comp. You will have to either just measure the tool ate the beginning of the job, or find a way to have the control adjust the measured value when it measures it the second time.

     

    HTH

     

    Glenn.

     

    P.S. What I mean is if you use full comp. and the machine measures the tool at .4998, and you need to take .005 more off of the profile of a part, you will change the comp value to .4973, unless your control uses radius, then you would change it to .4948

  12. Someone has to be different, so I guess that it will be me. I liked using the earlier versions better. There is a lot of stuff that is better about the way that X works, but as far as the interface, I liked the standard keyboard shortcuts in V9 and earlier. There is a lot of customization in X, and that is part of what creates issues for me. I hate all of the icon driven toolbars, and that every computer you go to has a completely different layout of mastercam. I spend half the time of helping someone trying to find the icons to show them, because that is what they want. I use the menus at the top for most things.

     

    JM2C

     

    Glenn

  13. Ken,

     

    I do this similar thing all of the time. All you do is create the new machine group, and copy/move the ops you want into the new machine group. You can create multiple groups, and then move the ops required to each one. The only issue that I have had, is if you have a transform/translate op, and you copy it to a new group, it references to it's original ops, and I have to open it, uncheck the original ops, and select the copies in the new machine group.

     

    HTH

     

    Glenn

  14. I don't know if it helps, but our Motion Master routers with the xxxxor control use a .pim file for the G-Code. So you used to be able to use a reverse post and take it back to mCam. I haven't tried to reverse post anything in X or X2 so I don't know if you even can.

     

    Glenn

  15. Eric,

     

    I think that we could make that work. We use the Manual Entry all the time. We will probably have to make sure that we do a force tool change for the first op of the next program though. confused.gif Why didn't I think of that cheers.gif thanks

     

    Glenn

     

    P.S We should probably also add something to end the program correctly like

    GOG91G28ZO;

    G90G53X-15YO;

    M5M9;

    M30;

    ;

    O0002

  16. Has anyone tweaked a post to output multiple machine programs in one file. I would like to be able to set the program # in mastercam, and then when I post have it put all of the programs ie: O0001, O0002 ect. into one file. Something like it does with sub-programs. We then would only need to send 1 file to our machines, which would break them into the individual programs.

     

    Thanks

     

    Glenn

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...