Tom
-
Posts
19 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
eMastercam Wiki
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by Tom
-
-
Thanks for the input. Randy
I have tried that as well. probably I will have to use it that way unless someone show me otherwise there' a disadvantage in this way is that several same N numbers generated as I am posting a program that recalls several time the same tool
-
Hello everybody,
I am a MasterCam Lathe newbie. Using MasterCam X2
SP1 NetHasp. Lathe Post MPL_GEN converted from V8.1 Generic Fanuc.
Here are my questions
I'd like to setup my post so that it outputs
the sequence number N only after each tool comment
ex. (TOOL 1 - .....)
N1
G28U0.
G0Z4.T0
G0T0101
......
(TOOL 4 - ....)
N2
....
I have tried this setting:
fmt, "N" 4 sequence_tool_n
and this codes after tool change:
seq_tool_n = n$
pbld, seq_tool_n, e$
n$ = n$ + 1
The output looks alright until it post a rough turn cycle:
G71U0
G71P102Q112U0W0F.01
G0N102X.4995
....
N112X1.05
....
these N mess up the sequence numbers hereafter
I am also looking for a way to output an incremental subprogram for deep hole drilling instead of long code or canned cycle.( I have been doing that part of program manually )
for ex. We are looking for
subpro like this
O9001
G00W-1.475
G01W-.045F.0015
G00W1.48
M99
and main program:
.....
G00T0808
G97S565M3
G00X0.Z1.485
M98P9001L35
......
M01
I am greatly appreciated any help you can provide
thank you very much for your time
-
Hello everyone,
I am currently having difficulty to get my lathe posts output the drilling, tapping codes like it did before. These posts were working fine
with MC version 8. after I converted them to version X2. now it outputs ""CUSTOMIZABLE DRILL CYCLE X0 Z.03" instead. what did I miss?
your help is very appreciated
-
folks,
I'm running Win98 SE.
probably you're right, I'll upgrade the O/S some time next week see if it solve the problems
Would let you know if it does not
Thank you very much for all the instructions
-
It is Win98
[ 08-28-2002, 01:06 AM: Message edited by: TOM ]
-
Hello folks
I'm constantly having problem with some mill and lathe programs in solid verification.
It crashed in the middle of the process. I've stil been using Mc V8.1.1 with MPFAN.PST
Below are the error msg that I got. I cut and pasted it here with the hope it would tell you
some of the problem
Your help would be appreciated
MILL8 caused an invalid page fault in
module SMODAPI.DLL at 0177:00fb89fa.
Registers:
EAX=123b59d0 CS=0177 EIP=00fb89fa EFLGS=00010246
EBX=00000018 SS=017f ESP=0148946c EBP=129b58e0
ECX=12ab7248 DS=017f ESI=00000000 FS=0f5f
EDX=00000000 ES=017f EDI=128b2c68 GS=0000
Bytes at CS:EIP:
8b 4e 10 3b c1 75 0a 8b 4f 04 8b 46 04 3b c8 74
Stack dump:
123af08c 00000000 00000000
123af00c 00000000 00fa87dc
123af00c 00000000 123af00c
00fa85e2 123af00c 123af08c
0ed3f00c 0ec3f00c 00e39cb2 123af00c
And lathe:
LATHE8 caused an invalid page fault in
module SMODAPI.DLL at 0177:01308f2b.
Registers:
EAX=00000000 CS=0177 EIP=01308f2b EFLGS=00010297
EBX=00000007 SS=017f ESP=01649204 EBP=0cbb2138
ECX=00000006 DS=017f ESI=0cbb213c FS=47e7
EDX=0ccaf408 ES=017f EDI=0cbb2138 GS=0000
Bytes at CS:EIP:
66 39 48 78 75 09 8b 50 04 66 39 4a 78 75 05 8b
Stack dump:
112af024 112af00c 0cbb2138 112af028 013044b5
0cbb2138 01649250 01649234 00000000
113af03c 016492b8 0d0af124
7800e9bc 0cbb5ebc 0caafd68 0130443e
-
folks,
At first, I would like to thank you very much for all the replies and solutions to my question
In reply to you folks question earlier. I will describe a little more detail what I'm trying
to do . I'm working on a program to cut a body of a mutiple pin electrical connector.
In this program, after drilling more than 100 deep holes, I need to put an undercut near bottom of each drilled holes
To cut these undercuts. We modify a carbide endmill to a very small diameter keyseat cutter.
The width of the cutter is much smaller than the undercut area that need to be cut to reduce the pushing force to the endmill
Therefore. It needs to travel several paths and technicaly, We want it starts to cut in the middle of the area. Cuts a
few circles upward and downward
Because, This whole operation will then be transformed to another 108 locations ( 108 pin connector )
so I'm afraid any transformed toolpath in the source operation would not be working in this particular case
-
Hello folk,
I'm working on a simple 2D contour ( a circle ) In this program, I need to program such that the cutter starts at the bottom ( final depth )
of the contour first and then cuts contour several paths upward ( rough step)
I'm wondering if there is a way to do that without defining mutiple circles and operations
I'm using V8.1.1
your help is appreciated
-
Excellent!
I feel much better now.
Dave' 2 magic post lines did the trick!perfectly!
I also tried craebild' codes. The result looked pretty good too!
Many thanks to you guys. for all your input
and special thanks to this forum. where I
can always learn and get support from
( while my dealer' leaving everything on my own )
-
Hello folks,
I'm looking for the way to force X and Y out
before entering subprograms in translate retangcular toolpath.
for instance, after a toolpath translated several times along x axis
the output looks like this
....
X-3.75Y0
M98P0001
X-2.75
M98P0001
X-1.75
M98P0001
.....
And this is the output I'm looking for
....
X-3.75Y0
M98P0001
X-2.75Y0
M98P0001
X-1.75Y0
M98P0001
.....
I have tried to replace postblocks: pxout,pyout under prapidout
by pfxout and pfyout. The result looked
good at the above section in my program. but confused at non-subprogram sections: It also forced X & Y out where it not supposed to do. So..I changed it back whew....
I'm using MCam V8.1.1 with MPFan
Your help would be greatly appreciated
[ 09-19-2001: Message edited by: TOM ]
-
thanks a lot for the help
This really is what I want to know
Love this forum!!
-
An empty MC8 file(doesn't contain any geometry or operation) in my system take
about 250kb. A file with several surfaces
and operations takes up to 800 kb!
I'm wondering if that is normal or there is something wrong with my Mastercam configuration. I'm using V8.1.1
Any help are very appreciated
-
It's sad to hear MC can't backplot or
verify a square profile tool.
As everybody knows, It generates the custom tool by internally revolving a profile. But We don't know why it' gotta be that way. coz cutting tools are not always revolved while
cutting.( like a slot Broach )
They are not always symmetrical about z axis.
Beside, If we are forced to use a round tool
instead of a square tool in backplot and
verify. The verification results won't tell
us a thing. yet there may be another problem
arised. coz the center of the Broach (or any
square profile tool) is not
the center of the spindle. It's pretty
dump isn't it?
James, About some custom tools won't appear
in verify mode-They won't appear in both
custom and standard. But in standard mode
it always use a Flat Endmill instead.
Charles, what file you wanna look at?
A MC8 file of a square profile tool or Broaching program on a VMC machine or a custom tool that won't appear in verify?
-
James,
Thanks for the link perhaps I missed
something. I didn't see any help that link
to my problem.
I didn't have any difficulty in customizing tools as well as scaling them. They look fine in backplot
The only problem is that they just
won't appear in solid verification
About the square tool profile-you meant I'll have to live with it? How are we gonna
backplot or verify solidly a Broach on VMC
machine broaching a keyway? (square tool
bit, spindle lock and moves up and down)
or we just have to guess?
would it be nice if it could take a STL or
any solid file as a tool profile. wouldn't it?
I have also tried Predator verification but
couldn't find what we need..
Any direction will be great
-
I'm using MC8.1 and I'm currently having
problem verifying my custom profile tools
in solid verification mode.
The tools appeared perfectly in backplot
but showed nothing in solid verify even though the program was still processing.
I did check the "show custom tool" in the
setup window in solid verification mode.
Any idea would be greatly appreciated :-)
Beside, I also wonder if it is possible
to make a square profile tool( like a square tool bit) appeared exacly in backplot and
solid verification mode
Thanks in advanced :-)
-
Elad, about the problem you mentioned earlier
let' try this see if it works for you,
in operation manager select renumber work offsets then set:
starting work offset number: 0
work offset number increment: 0
check the " use matching..." window
and the "overwrite work offset.."window
have fun!
-
Hey! ya da man!
your solution works perfectly for me
I got a warning same as yours "work offset numbers used in more than 1 view" but that is normal. The output looks better
thanks a bunch, Elad, Dave and
many thanks to those who responded the question
------------------
TL
-
Anyone in here can show me how to turn off
and on the work coordinates ( G55,G56...) outputting in the nc file of the rotated toolpaths. For instance, I rotated a simple
toolpath around to mill a hex on rotary axis.
Each time the toolpath rotated, it output
G55,G56,G57..Unnecessarily
I wonder if there is an option to turn it on and off or I'll have to configure my post?
I'm TOM. A new user of Mastercam. The Version
I'm using is V8.1.
your help would be greatly appreciated )
------------------
TL
Lathe Post Questions
in Industrial Forum
Posted
Roger
Your codes do the trick!! wonderful !
Thank you so much for your help
Love this forum