Heidi post

[Jack Neelands™]

Hey guys...was wondering if any of you were able to get your post to put out a repeat number after the CALL LBL when clicking on the absolute/incremental subprogram icon in the depths of cut window

 

psub_call_s$ #Call to sub level

sub_prg_no$ = sub_prg_no$ + 100 #Add sub number offset

pbld, n$, "CALL LBL ", *sub_prg_no$,(SOMETHING NEEDS TO GO IN HERE) e$

 

Would also like to see that option in the ramping window as well and be able to get it to work that way....anY takers?

 

 

Im am trying to avoid this

 

 

8 L X+35.3553 Y+35.3553 R0 F MAX M3

9 L B+90 F MAX

10 L Z+10 F MAX

11 L IZ-9.9 F MAX

12 L IZ-.02 F250

13 CALL LBL 102

14 L IZ-.02 F250

15 CALL LBL 102

16 L IZ-.02 F250

17 CALL LBL 102

18 L IZ-.02 F250

19 CALL LBL 102

20 L IZ-.02 F250

21 CALL LBL 102

22 L IZ-.02 F250

23 CALL LBL 102

24 L IZ+.12 F100000

25 L IZ+9.9 F MAX

26 M5

27 B+0 F MAX

28 M02

1 ;

2 LBL 102

3 L IX-1.4142 IY+1.4143 RL F1000

4 CC IX+1.4142 IY-1.4142

5 C IX+2.8285 IY-2.8285 DR+

6 CC IX-1.4142 IY+1.4142

7 C IX-2.8285 IY+2.8285 DR+

8 L IX+1.4142 IY-1.4143 R0

9 LBL 0

 

 

and get this instead

 

 

8 L X+35.3553 Y+35.3553 R0 F MAX M3

9 L B+90 F MAX

10 L Z+10 F MAX

11 L IZ-9.9 F MAX

12 L IZ-.02 F250

13 CALL LBL 102 REP 6 <-----SEE THE DIFFERANCE?

24 L IZ+.12 F100000

25 L IZ+9.9 F MAX

26 M5

27 B+0 F MAX

28 M02

1 ;

2 LBL 102

3 L IX-1.4142 IY+1.4143 RL F1000

4 CC IX+1.4142 IY-1.4142

5 C IX+2.8285 IY-2.8285 DR+

6 CC IX-1.4142 IY+1.4142

7 C IX-2.8285 IY+2.8285 DR+

8 L IX+1.4142 IY-1.4143 R0

9 LBL 0

[Jack Neelands™]

OK Maybe a different approach....

 

anybody get their MP master to call up the number of repeats that is required in their sub programs ....if so... what do you have in this area of your post?

 

 

would be located in here

 

 

pbld, n$, "M98", *sub_prg_no$, e$

[alma999]

If you use CALL LBL with REP then the called LBL must before CALL LBL! This method works like GOTO.

 

Example:

8 CC X+188,500 Y-50,000

9 LP PR+5,000 PA+0,000 R F555 M

10 LBL 1

11 CP IPA+360,000 IZ-1,000 DR+ R F200 M

12 CALL LBL 1 REP 3 /3

13 CP IPA+360,000 DR+ R F M

14 LP PR+0,000 PA+0,000 R F555 M09

15 Z+100,000 R F5555 M05

16 STOP M00

 

This code not work!

 

8 L X+35.3553 Y+35.3553 R0 F MAX M3

9 L B+90 F MAX

10 L Z+10 F MAX

11 L IZ-9.9 F MAX

12 L IZ-.02 F250

13 CALL LBL 102 REP 6 < Go to LBL102 and not return!

24 L IZ+.12 F100000

25 L IZ+9.9 F MAX

26 M5

27 B+0 F MAX

28 M02

1 ;

2 LBL 102

3 L IX-1.4142 IY+1.4143 RL F1000

4 CC IX+1.4142 IY-1.4142

5 C IX+2.8285 IY-2.8285 DR+

6 CC IX-1.4142 IY+1.4142

7 C IX-2.8285 IY+2.8285 DR+

8 L IX+1.4142 IY-1.4143 R0

9 LBL 0

 

The correct code:

8 L X+35.3553 Y+35.3553 R0 F MAX M3

9 L B+90 F MAX

10 L Z+10 F MAX

11 L IZ-9.9 F MAX

< removed L IZ-.02 F250

13 CALL LBL 102 < REP removed

24 L IZ+.12 F100000

25 L IZ+9.9 F MAX

26 M5

27 B+0 F MAX

28 M02

1 ;

2 LBL 102

L IZ-.02 F250 < inserted

3 L IX-1.4142 IY+1.4143 RL F1000

4 CC IX+1.4142 IY-1.4142

5 C IX+2.8285 IY-2.8285 DR+

6 CC IX-1.4142 IY+1.4142

7 C IX-2.8285 IY+2.8285 DR+

8 L IX+1.4142 IY-1.4143 R0

9 CALL LBL 102 REP 6 < Repeat here

10 LBL 0

 

CALL LBLxxx REPyy = GOTO with repeat, nesting levels endless! The LBL definiton must first, CALL with REP later!

 

CALL LBLxxx = Subrutine call, nesting levels max. 8!

 

These two very different method.

[pip]

The Z incremental minus move must be inside the label you want to repeat, or the part will be cut by the REP command at the same level. It will not cut deaper every repeat. Jack, your version will work if you place the Z incremental move inside the LBL SET.

Alma's version is the way I would program it, by hand, but then you do not have control over the LBL to change the REP funtion. When you want a clean up cut, you could call the LBL again but only once with Jacks method. With Alma's the LBL will allways repeat 6 times.

[Jack Neelands™]

Thanks guys....getting the Z increment in the label was my next move on this post but Im still trying to get the repeat to output with the depths of cut.

 

I program both the 430 and 530 controller by hand and using mastercam...just trying to get the same output as I would if I were to do it by hand