Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

CDL2042

Verified Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CDL2042

  1. I know the alt+t toggles operations on and off, but how do you default them to OFF?

     

    I got a new mouse a few weeks ago and I got a little sloppy with the button clicking and now my toolpaths are always ON and then I have to turn off every toolpath as I make it. I have no clue what I did to change the display, but I remember doing it!

  2. Thanks for the replies. I am talking more about a mouse than a 3D mouse, but now you have me thinking.

     

    Does a 3D mouse (for the left hand?) save a lot of work for the regular mouse in the right hand? I guess I keep my left hand anchored by the ESC and function keys and try to use it as much as possible.

     

    What do you guys do?

  3. I am looking at the Evoluent Vertical mouse. Is anyone still using it (old thread)?

     

    Can you program all the buttons for Mastercam use?

     

    I have been using a Microsoft 2 button mouse with scroll wheel for about 14 years now, but I do have pain in my right forearm. The Evoluent looks like a good idea to me.

  4. One thing to consider, if you have older computers you may have to update the computers and/or windows to get X3 to run on them.

     

    We updated right away, and the guys in the shop were still on X2 and now they can't open the files unless we save them out as X2 files.

     

    Looking back on the decision to update right away, I would have waited. There is nothing great about X3, and if it is going to cause other problems it is not worth it. Another disapointing mcam release.

  5. Yes, I didn't update my signature. I am running MR2 SP1, and yes I know you need to drag the arrow to the right end. It doesn't work, and I was just looking for possible solutions.

     

    I'm going to try redrawing the line as Matt suggested.

     

    BTW it worked in X2 sp1.

     

    Thanks

  6. I just updated to MR2 SP1, and now when I try to create a dynamic arc, it uses the opposite end of the entity for the start of the arc. Anyone have an idea why?

     

    This is a prime example of why I dread every new release, same amount of bugs, just in different places.

     

    Suggestion for MR3. Don't release it until it is actually better than X,X2,X2MR1, etc.

  7. I have had that happen too. Try highlighting all operations and right click on the group name. Then click on edit selected operations and change NC file name to what you want. This works for me even though the NC file name appears to be right the first time.

     

    If I remember right, this happens when I bring in someone else's file and add ops to it.

  8. Thanks, after reading the links, maybe a test bar would be the way to go.

     

    I wonder why the service tech didn't suggest that? If that is the problem (spindle taper), is that something that can be corrected?

  9. I guess we will keep testing. Our operators are very good, and we have never noticed this problem until recently.

     

    You are right though, the ROKU is extremly accurate, .0006 is HUGE for us, and we wonder how we will be able to mill critical things with confidence anymore.

     

    As far as work offset, I already explained that when we try to offset to compensate, the result is not predictable. I wonder if Kevin was on to something with the spindle taper?

     

    Thank you guys for the advice, I will keep you posted. Maybe its just something stupid that we are missing.

  10. We use a 3-R system most of the time, but in this case the block was in a vise. We have the same problem with the 3-R though, because we had to rework a mold with .0006 mismatch from the electrode. That is how we discovered this situation.

  11. Yes the machine is warmed up, the guys are pretty good at doing that.

     

    Here is what they told me. They cut the pocket, it was shifted x-.0006, so they tried it again with a x +.0006 offset hoping that would put the pocket on center. It didn't. The pocket moved to x+.0006.

     

    That is messed up. headscratch.gif

  12. Our ROKU 658 has developed a problem. It is cutting off center about .0006 in the x-axis only.

    You can pick up a ground block on center, mill a pocket, and pick up the block again. The block will still be on center, and the pocket will not.

     

    We had it checked with a laser, and a ball bar, and everything looks great.

     

    I was wondering if anyone has experienced the same thing?

  13. We use Jabro solid carbide ball/bull nose cutters in tool steels (48-56).

     

    I haven't shopped around much, so I'm not sure how they compare on price or performance, but they seem to work fine. I am open for any suggestions.

     

    Our machine goes to 32,000 rpm and we usually use cutters 10mm or smaller.

  14. I am using wear.

     

    I will try switching the arc output first, if that doesn't work, then I will try the reverse wear. Thanks to both of you!

     

    BTW Kannon, I wish I was still using 9.1!!!

     

    One year after switching to X, and numerous side by side and overwrite installs later, I really don't know what I gained by switching to X.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...