Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Pete Thomson

Verified Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pete Thomson

  1. Before i changed toolno = t$ * 100 + tloffno$ to toolno = t$ * 100 + t$ it would post T0900 instead of T09?? the last 2 digits are for the tool length. It would index to tool 9 but would have zero tool length offset toolno = t$ * 100 + t$ works if i want the same tool & length number, but some times i might need T0919 is it possible to use toolno = t$ * 100 + ( Len. offset) ?
  2. on the #tool change mill it was toolno = t$ * 100 + tolffno$ but on my c-axis face drill the Dia offset is 0 and greyed out. i changed it to toolno = t$ * 100 + t$ then it posted T0909 is there any way to get dia offset un-greyed? Thanks
  3. I couldn't figure out the above solution. I put " sg98 " into the canned drill cycle below and i seemed to work. mdrill$ #Canned drill cycle, mill pdrlcommonb pcan1, pbld, n$, *sgdrlref, pgdrlout, sg98, pxout, pyout, pzout, pcout, prdrlout, dwell$, pffr, strcantext, e$ pcom_movea My reseller said - without looking at the entire I can't say if there are anger conflicts but it looks good. what are anger conflicts? When I use canned drill cycle it outputs T0900 when i need T0909 the reseller said I needed to edit a math equation in the post would it be something like- toolno = t$ * 100 + zero Thanks
  4. I have a fanuc 18i control and using- GENERIC FANUC 4X MT_LATHE.pst when i use C axis face drill the post outputs the feed in IPM and I need IPR also my "Dia offset 0" box is greyed in C-axis face drill out so when it post i get T0900 in stead of T0909 X7 mu2 puma TT2500SY fanuc 18i Thanks G0 T0900 G17 M35 M8 G0 G54 Z.25 X3.74 C180. G97 S3834 M33 G83 Z-.343 R.1 F15.34 C60. C300. G80 M9 G28 U0. H0. M35 G28 W0. H0. T0900
  5. Thanks for the help I decided to change to MPFAN post and edit all the changes that i made in my old post ot MPFAN Pete
  6. hello I replaced my, ptap$ #Canned Tap Cycle with ptap$ #Canned Tap Cycle pdrlcommonb result = newfs(17, feed) # Set for tapping Feedrate format if met_tool$, [ if toolismetric, pitch = n_tap_thds$ #Metric NC Code - Metric Tap else, pitch = (1/n_tap_thds$) * 25.4 #Metric NC Code - English Tap ] else, [ if toolismetric, pitch = n_tap_thds$ * (1/25.4) #English NC Code - Metric Tap else, pitch = 1/n_tap_thds$ #English NC Code - English Tap ] pitch = pitch * speed #Force Units Per Minute for regular Tap cycle pbld, n$, sg94, e$ pcan1, pbld, n$, *sgdrlref, *sgdrill, pxout, pyout, pfzout, pcout, prdrlout, *pitch, !feed, strcantext, e$ pcom_movea from MPFAN.pst this is what i got- G99G84Z-.5R.1 this is what i want G99G84Z-.5R.1S713F.0625 here are the errors 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <0> - Report created. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Initialize posting log file 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Using MP run version 16.00 and post components version 16.00 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Initiate opening the post processor file(s). 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\SHARED MCAMX7\MILL\POSTS\MITSUBISHI MELDAS 4 - AXIS HMC.PST 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - The post processor file has been successfully opened. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Post version information (input): 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - UPDATEPOST Version 16. was used to modify this file. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - The file was modified by this product on 05 Sep 2013 13:37:32 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - The post was written to run with Mastercam Version 16. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - The post product type is Mill. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Initialization of pre-defined post variables, strings, postblocks was successful. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Search for defined post variables, strings, postblocks was successful. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1124) - The formula/boolean failed (general message), , Label has not been defined[12] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1124) - The formula/boolean failed (general message) 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1124) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label has not been defined[26] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1124) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label was expected but was not found[32], Illegal character(s) encountered 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1125) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label has not been defined[15] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1125) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label was expected but was not found[21], Illegal character(s) encountered 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1129) - The formula/boolean failed (general message), , Label has not been defined[12] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1129) - The formula/boolean failed (general message) 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1129) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label has not been defined[26] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1129) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label was expected but was not found[32], Illegal character(s) encountered 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1130) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label has not been defined[15] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1130) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label was expected but was not found[21], Illegal character(s) encountered 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1132) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label has not been defined[7] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1132) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label was expected but was not found[13], Illegal character(s) encountered 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - PST LINE (1135) - The post block output type processing has failed!, , Label has not been defined[19] 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'dec_seq_right$' was re-initialized from 3. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arcoutput$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arcoutputxz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arcoutputyz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larcoutput$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larctypexz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larcoutputyz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arccheck$' was re-initialized from 1. to 111. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larccheck$' was re-initialized from 1. to 111. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'rotfeed4$' was re-initialized from 2. to 1. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'rotfeed5$' was re-initialized from 3. to 1. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'lrotfeed4$' was re-initialized from 2. to 1. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'lrotfeed5$' was re-initialized from 0. to 1. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'peckacel$' was re-initialized from 0. to 1. 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - RUN TIME - PST(1129), NCI(100) - The math calculation/formula has an error 15 May 2014 10:27:13 AM - <2> - Successful completion of posting process!
  7. I couldn't fine the switch " pitch_tap " in my post . is it possible to create a formula ( *feed / *speed ) = ipr
  8. Hello I have a Medlas m3 control (Mitsubishi). On my post i need to output feed in Inches per revolution ptap$ #Canned Tap Cycle pdrlcommonb "M05", e$ pcan1, pbld, n$, *sgdrlref, *sgdrill, pxout, pyout, pfzout, pcout, prdrlout, *feed, *speed, strcantext, e$ pcom_movea I added the ( "m05", e$ ) line to stop the spindle which works but I need to change the feed form F44.57 to F.0625 (3/8-16 tap) G00G90G54X0.Y-8.886B90.S713M03 G43H203Z2.M08T123 M05 G98G84Z.787R1.5375F44.57S713 Thanks Pete X7 mu2
  9. I am using a different machine def for each machine. I would have to rotate drawing 180 deg to machine the same side of a part in the opposite chuck . The problem i just had was on the left chuck machine, I had the stock defined, I had on lathe finish Home position (user defined) d10. z10., boring bar home d14.0 z8.0, Left upper all approaches and retracts at X.1 , machine default home x10. y5.0, and on Control def I had Tool Lathe , get position (home) from machine def. when the boring bar was done it retracted to z-.3512 and then straight up! then when i changed Lathe finish properties to home position -From Machine it retracts to z..03 if i change it back to Lathe finish properties- home position - user defined - it retracts to z.03 still??? I don't trust it at all I could default Lathe finish properties to check Ref Box and default retract x0, then remember to hit "From Machine" inside the Fef point box, which would but in x+.1 or x-.1 depending on left or right chuck. that way if i forgot the boring bars would retract to z0 at least. hope MC fixes this - 5 different places to put home position in- it could be simpler and safer! x7 mu2
  10. I'm trying to get my boring bar to retract before going straight up (home). I have 3 lathes with left chucks and 1 with a right chuck. Have tried defining stock and setting ref points and that works MOST!! of the time. Is there any way to get the right chuck lathe to load a different operation default file automatically? Then I could have the ref point box checked and have approach and retract set to Z.1. every time I open a lathe opp. Then it wouldn't matter if i forgot to define the material or X7 decides it doesn't feel like it want's to retract . Thanks Pete
  11. I found this change dia_mult from 2 to -2 in the post I am still trying to approch the part z first then x any one? Pete

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...