It's by far the closest without spending money on another program. It's was a little bit off with any program with a tapping cycle though. Is there something else I can do for that? Thanks also for getting as close as I am now.

Would like to do that, but my employers would use that as a last result. Software looks great though. Thanks

What did you change the value to? Still on default settings. Which is .01. Also running X5, if that makes any difference?

Would like the backplot times to match the runtimes on our HAAS VF5 and VF6. I've messed with the rapid traverse settings and made some progress. I feel as though I'm moving in the wrong direction. The rapid on the HAAS is about 710 IPM. Yet, I'm anywhere from 50-100 IPM just to get close to making the times match. This changes again if there are numerous tool changes. It was suggested the problem is in the backplot. It doesn't know the acceleration of the machine as well as the height from the tool changer. Is there any way that I can fill in these variables into Mastercam? I'm guessing like setting up some sort of a virtual machine setting? Or am I living in a dreamworld? Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks.

Would like the backplot times to match the runtimes on our HAAS VF5 and VF6. I've messed with the rapid traverse settings and made some progress. I feel as though I'm moving in the wrong direction. The rapid on the HAAS is about 710 IPM. Yet, I'm anywhere from 50-100 IPM just to get close to making the times match. This changes again if there are numerous tool changes. It was suggested the problem is in the backplot. It doesn't know the acceleration of the machine as well as the height from the tool changer. Is there any way that I can fill in these variables into Mastercam? I'm guessing like setting up some sort of a virtual machine setting? Or am I living in a dreamworld? Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks.