Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Don S at Barefoot CNC South

Verified Members
  • Posts

    1,128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Don S at Barefoot CNC South

  1. Format:HTML Format Version:1.0 StartHTML: 165 EndHTML: 4764 StartFragment: 314 EndFragment: 4732 StartSelection: 314 EndSelection: 314

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <0> - Report created.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - Initialize posting log file

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - Using MP run version 16.00 and post components version 16.00

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - Initiate opening the post processor file(s).

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - Y:\TFO DEPARTMENTS\CNC\MC X7 POST\PUMA LATHE POST\PUMA 400.PST

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - The post processor file has been successfully opened.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - Post version information (input):

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - UPDATEPOST Version 16. was used to modify this file.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - The file was modified by this product on 29 May 2013 10:21:32

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - The post was written to run with Mastercam Version 16.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:33 AM - <2> - The post product type is Mill/Turn.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - Initialization of pre-defined post variables, strings, postblocks was successful.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - Search for defined post variables, strings, postblocks was successful.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'ltol$' was re-initialized from 0.002 to 0.0005

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'atol$' was re-initialized from 0.01 to 0.5

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'maxnccomment$' was re-initialized from 256. to 120.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'dec_seq_left$' was re-initialized from 3. to 4.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'sub_seq_typ$' was re-initialized from 0. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'tplanemode$' was re-initialized from 2. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arcoutput$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arcoutputxz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arcoutputyz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larctype$' was re-initialized from 6. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larcoutput$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larctypexz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larctypeyz$' was re-initialized from 6. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larcoutputyz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 0.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'breakarcs$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'breakarcsxz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'breakarcsyz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'lbreakarcsxz$' was re-initialized from 1. to 2.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'arccheck$' was re-initialized from 1. to 111.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'larccheck$' was re-initialized from 1. to 111.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'rotfeed4$' was re-initialized from 2. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'rotfeed5$' was re-initialized from 3. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'lrotfeed4$' was re-initialized from 2. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'lrotfeed5$' was re-initialized from 0. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - CONTROL DEFINITION - Post variable 'peckacel$' was re-initialized from 0. to 1.

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - PARAMETER DATA - The requested parameter data object was not created: Operation parameters

    30 Sep 2013 08:41:34 AM - <2> - Successful completion of posting process!

  2. For some reason I am getting post errors now I am sure its something I did.

     

    27 Aug 2013 07:06:41 AM - <2> - PST LINE (2015,2015) - The function can not be nested in a formula[36]

    27 Aug 2013 07:06:41 AM - <2> - PST LINE (2016,2016) - The function can not be nested in a formula[34]

    27 Aug 2013 07:06:41 AM - <2> - PST LINE (2016,2016) - The variable/string declaration is a duplicate, , Duplicate assignment of label

    27 Aug 2013 07:06:41 AM - <2> - PST LINE (2017,2017) - The variable/string declaration is a duplicate, , Duplicate assignment of label

    27 Aug 2013 07:06:41 AM - <2> - PST LINE (2018,2018) - The variable/string declaration is a duplicate, , Duplicate assignment of label

    27 Aug 2013 07:06:41 AM - <2> - PST LINE (2015,2015) - The math calculation/formula has an error

  3. quote:

    Everyone should vote ...


    1st off Code I lost my job because I missed a work around.... and a multi axis program they ran on my day off took 9hrs to run and hours of manual editing at the machine... so my vote would be a waste of time. Its funny now how little this all matters now. CNC will fix some things but so be it, companys don't want to hear about work arounds, or its a new bug they are working on it, the programmer is the one that answeres not CNC until the company has had enough and learns the truth. Until then let CNC have my vote...IDMS

  4. I did not want to say this but here goes

    MU1 was a big reason for my situation now, un caught errors in the program multi axis, due to my trust in the upgrade cost me dearly ya think?

     

    No new release will fix what happened here.

    So instead of looking for work arounds just looking for work now! We all have become beta testers and at whos expense? didn't vote you know my vote.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...