Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

JAKOB JAKOBSEN

Verified Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by JAKOB JAKOBSEN

  1. Hi I have some problems regarding convertion of, primery dwg to Mc8, the mastercan program converter is not good enought. it removes all messioers and places some lines up to 4 meters from where they should be.. What other programs can be used ?? is there a program to just look at a file ( dwg,dxf,iges,mc8) best regards Jakob Jakobsen
  2. Charles Davis I will look forward to that day, and if i am wrong i would be the first to say, i am sorry. >>>The US is, for the moment, the only superpower in the world. That puts special burdens on us (for example in Bosnia, Iraq, and even hold the line against the former USSR). Some of these tasks we are asked to participate in.<<< Denmark participated allso in Bosnia,Iraq, and , former jugoslavin, we corrently have soldier in Bosnia, peace keapers in severel africane countrys. police observers in the occupied westbank ( palastine), and india, we are onely 5mill peoble in denmark but we are trynig to do the right things anyway. and fill out our place in the world oder. to Bob >>>I know... denmark is a small contry and can´t do that, but if we could. I think that the US. do not see other contrys like there equal but as somebody to take advantech off, if that is not the trught way does echelon exist?<<< I mean that denmark is too small a country to force the danish politik on any other counrty. but if we could, we will not do it like the US. by force... Echelon.. you know what that is!!! or you can read about it here http://www.cipherwar.com/echelon/ then try to denie it.. Sorry about my english but ( jeg vil hellere skrive på dansk men så forstår du mig jo nok ikke) I rather wrihte in danish but then you might not understand me. So i do my best.. best regards Jakob Jakobsen
  3. Charles Davis Bob Hi Do not get me wrong, i think you must retalliet. hard. But i hear that you might want to invade a suverren contry to get to one mand, like U.S dit in panama, That i can not accept. When i read news groups from the US. i see allmoust the same fanatisen, as the terrorists displayed, i know that there allways will be somebody that is extreem, just look in here. I do not think that Denmark is a target for terror, because we do not force our policy on other contrys, and we do not invade other contrys at your good will. I know... denmark is a small contry and can´t do that, but if we could. I think that the US. do not see other contrys like there equal but as somebody to take advantech off, if that is not the trught way does echelon exist?? What will US have done if et whas a other contey that used echelon agenst US.. Invade?? invasion and cruse Missiles, echelon and support to terrorist( that will support US policy) is not the way to say to the world that we are all equal.. best regards jakob Jakobsen
  4. charles davis >1. I don't think the terrorist are cowards, just evil and inhuman.< I agree !! But are they only evel and inhumane, when they strike USA ?? When Bin Laden was agenst the USSR in Afganistan it was whit US fondings. whay ?? >2. We used cruise missiles to avoid our own casualties.< I know, And thats not ny beef, But if they are so accurate, one shoud be sufficient not 70. That is the way to creating a martyr, and thats what i´m afried you wil do in a strike back, blow it out of proporsion and attacking a suveren contry, witch PERHAPS is housing him?? >If that's your beef, don't worry, we'll root these xxxx out by hand, like we did in the Pacific during WWII< With help from severel other countryes, remember that, you dit not win WWII single handed... >3. We have avoided paying fees to the UN because we totally disagree with its policies, those set by a very radical group of countries, many of the same who support these terrorist.< That it the most lame i have heard longe, That is the same as saying i wil not pay taxe, because the goverment´s politik is not my politik, But. Sorry to say typicat US policy, "if its not good for US it´s crap" >Take, for example, having the Sudan and others vote the U.S. off the civil rights commission!< Sudan is a member like the U.N. like or not, but that is demorkratic to the extend. we can not make special democratik rules for the U.S. can we?? >We can take the insult; just don't ask us to pick up the tab to be insulted.< does the U.N. insult you ?? are you not a member?? Then quit nobody are interested in a member, that will boss everybody around without paying the ammount, every other contry is paying and are glad to do... >4. We ditched Kyoto because it was a totally flawed and bogus treaty, and you know that.< How can redoucing the co2 be flawed and bogus, what is bogus, is that a contry can baye the rights to pollute more, As the U.S. forced throug.. >It expected us to shoulder much of the burden for cleaning up greenhouse gases but exempted China and others that are far worse polluters on a per capita basis.< The U.S. stands for 40% of the co2 relised into the air. That is not good for the world but it aperently goodenought for the U.S. that woht have been forced to reduse, but as allways U.S. runs from all agreements that is not good for U.S. and leve it to outers. >Besides, did ANY other country ratify that treaty?< To use a U.S. saying " whay shout we, the U.S will not and the U.S. is the biggest poluter" >That doesn't mean we are pro-pollution; just realistic and more analytical about the cost/benefit.< Exsagley the cost is too high, to make the world a better place. Hwo will start?? the biggest economy and the biggest polluter in the world..NO..!! >Don't forget that BAD policies that SOUND good do more harm to humanity that GOOD policies that don't sound policially correct.< You will have to explain that?? >WAKE UP; if terrorism is not defeated now, in 3-5 years you'll have Nuclear devices going off in NY, Chicago, London, Toronto, Berlin, London, and more.< I agree.. What will that do for the environment? What will that do to your family? Those radioactive clouds drift far and wide, and NONE of you are safe; not in your homes, and certainly not flying, until this cancer is demolished. I agree agen, but whay not get rit off all atomic weapons and reactors. That will be the best solutinon for the invironment and it will make it inpossible for terrorist to get any bombes, and don´t say they will build them self. >AFTER THAT, we do need to work with other countries to undo what causes all this hatred in the first place.< Yahoo that is the best i have heard longe, expecilly from a Americane. >Perhaps YOUR country will wish to donate Billions of dollars to a fund to provide food, clothing, education and employment opportunities to those desperate people living in poor middle eastern countries.< We are allreadey doing that. We pays over 3% of our BNP. As it is decided in the UN. signed by the US. to thouse less fortunal. do U.S do that or is that to cousely?? Just a single quistian more, whay does the U.S runs from the agreement not to make a missileshild. is that too coustley to NOT make??? Can´t you see that is the way, to make your self a target, becouse you do it regardless to all the contrys that is asking you not to. But if any other contry is trying to do somthing simuler they are targets for economel sansions and trade boycot, forced by USA. best regards Jakob Jakobsen [ 09-17-2001: Message edited by: JAKOB JAKOBSEN ]
  5. Hi Bryan Well put! I can for one not see how the hijackers can be called for cowardly the are using the onely and best weapon they have, and payes the ultimate price, there lives, Do not misunderstand this i think the attack on WTC and pentagon is terrible and think it is wrong, very wrong. But if somebody is coward its bin ladin not the peoble in the planes, This type of war is impossible to protect anyone agenst. As it is impossible for the peoble you use cruise missiles agenst to protect themselws and they havent smart bombs or cruise missiles so they use what they have and they calles that cowardly. But sendt 70 missiles after one man from 1000 of miles away, that is war?? USA have declared war on terrorists but that is a war they cant win... to Charles Davis If the us economy is the lagest in the world whay does the us not pay the billions of dollers they owe the UN.?? like the rest of the members of the UN. somone else said that usa could do anything they put there mind to. ex. put a man on the moon severel times. and that is a achivement no dout about that. But they can allso make a agreement in kioto about redousing pollution, sign it and run from it, saying that it cant be done, it cost too mutch!! what dit it coust to put a man on the moon an dit it make the world a better place?? I think its about time the politisions in the US looks back and says perhabs we could do somthing in our one country before we say to the world, this is the right way, our way Best regards Jakob Jakobsen
  6. Hi all!! Just a littel word for the other side of the world, more accurate Denmark. (on top of EU) we all feel your pain, and will do all in our power to help, the danish goverment has desidet to, if nesery deploy danish millitary in a strike to international terrorisen, That is the first time that happens, perhaps this will bring the civillied world closer to gether, I for one was wery proud to see on national tv. that severel thousend danes was outside the US embaseade i kobenhaven the same night to lite candelights an to put flowers in front of the gate. to show that your not alone with you paine. best regards Jakob Jakobsen.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...