Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Bob Mikl

Verified Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bob Mikl

  1. I run Charmilles wire machines and I just modified an existing library.

    I make up .tec files at the machines which gives me all my offsets, so the only thing I use the power library for is to insert condition codes.

  2. I operate Charmilles wire machines and I use G92 at the start of each program and if I need to run multiple setups in the machine I set points for each location and then call up the multiple programs and points using a .cmd file.

  3. no interferance with the nozzle, and there are no compound angles in the part.

    I think everyone is right in suggesting the guide distances are off but I have to figure out how to accuratley measure to my guides that are up into the holders.

    Maybe Charmilles has that dimension.

  4. Matt, yes you are correct, unfortunately I did not list the sequence in the order in which it was performed.

    I belive John has a good idea about double checking the guide setup with gage blocks, but I am having problems accurately figuring the dimenision because I need to take into account the guide holder.

  5. I am trying to cut a 15-degree angle using a charmilles robofil 510. Before the cut I completed a guide setup at the maximum angle of 10-degrees, switched to large flushing cups, changed out threading diffuser to 1.8mm, changed over to soft brass wire, and had Mastercam double check my part program to make sure it was correct. After all that preparation the part is consistently ¼ degree off. I can manually compensate for this error but I would think I should be able to achieve better accuracy. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

  6. To start the no core wirepath closer to the finshed diameter then draw a second hole inside at the desired size and when chaining, chain the small diameter then the finished diameter.

     

    I hope this makes sense! Let me know if this works for you.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...