I just noticed this and was quite happy to find it, any opinions or warnings?

Thanks Guys.,

I could not agree with both of you more, but I like to see if I am the only one who does things the way I do, Jeff your HS and Dynamic were my arguments versus comping on and off as you said, the real kicker in this is we run a Cutter comp Macro that verifys there is comp in the control, the achinist edited this when his over size tool ALARMED out and did not consider the rghing not sure about you but I typically rgh closer than 1/8 inch

Thanks again guys and have a great Thanksgiving...

Good Morning and Happy Thanksgiving Forum

I have a pocket programmed to rgh and finish with a 3/4 dia tool, I simply rgh the pocket in steps and Leave desired stock then Finish with a Comp Pass,

The Machinist decided to use a 1.0 dia Tool instead of the 3/4, Im sure you can all see where this is going, the rghing is now 1/4 inch oversize , and the Comp pass is fine, so I am asked why we cannot pocket "with comp to allow tool options instead of the tool programmed. I say we are not going to be able to do this simply, the examples used against me are "canned Cycle" and I have not been able to make clear the difference in "Canned Cycles" and pocket routines from Mastercam. Your opinions are always appreciated

ptlchg$          #Tool change                     
      tloffno_1 = tloffno$ + 50
             prv_tloffno$ = 999
      cnt = t$
      pcuttype
      toolchng = one
      if mi1$ = one, #Work coordinate system

Is this the area causing the issue this adds 50 to the T# for our D value?

Happy Veterans Day and heartfelt Thank You to all the Veterans, we owe you so much

I have a Matsura J300 M I want to out put the D value at each G41 or G42 Callout can any one head me in the right direction?

Tyron and Millman thanks for your responses, Tyron I agree and the cycle automatically returns to the initial X, not here but that may be a machinist preference, however the N placement and the error are not. Millman I have sent this to support I am waiting for the response,expect it anytime now I will post the answer when it is figured out. We have one the Super NT250 with the touch screen, Mixed reviews from the machinists and I personally have not gotten used to touch screen and I really do not like touching screens because finger prints drive me nuts on my PC...

Carpe Diem

Hello Forum

We have (3) NTY 3 and (1) NT250 Nakamura Tome MillTurns all with Fanuc 31i controls, in the G71 cycle 2 machines allow as the book shows the Last N# called out by the Q in the Canned Parameters line of the cycle to have data in it

(SOLIDTURN - ROUGHING)
G00X3.5Z.05
G71U.1R.02
G71P1000Q1001U.01W.003F.01
N1000G00X2.3095
G01Z-.55F.01
X3.3338
G03X3.385Z-.5756I0.K-.0256
G01Z-1.013
N1001X3.5

and 2 machines will alarm out unless the Last N# called out by Q in the canned cycle is alone

(SOLIDTURN - ROUGHING)
G00X3.5Z.05
G71U.1R.02
G71P1000Q1001U.01W.003F.01
N1000G00X2.3095
G01Z-.55F.01
X3.3338
G03X3.385Z-.5756I0.K-.0256
G01Z-1.013
X3.5
N1001

This to me seems like a parameter setting, would any of you know and be willing to share what parameter this might be?

Carpe Diem

Kennebec
 

see your reseller...

Hello Forum

With all the "Cloud" talk going on and utilization of manufacture drawings and knowledge base info, have any of you used anything like the Kennametal NOVO app?

Thanks everyone for the responses

I am interested in the "surface high speed scallop with fillet edge boundaries, time is a big deal in everything we quote so I'm sure it will not be the only option.

We use a lot of the Harvey tools also...

As rightfully recommended I attached a file to my original post, it is positioned as seen on multi tasking machine and all the color 9 lines and splines are to be .005/.02 edge breaks...

Hello Forum

More and more deburring is being required in the machine, I find that this "can" be as challenging as the pathing of the part, I'm curious how you are accomplishing this.

3 axis VM with Rotary Indexing, 3 axis HM with Rotary Indexing and, 2 Spindle 3 turret all with Y axis Multi Task machines

Mastercam 7 Mill level 3

DEBURRING .MCX-7

PcRobotic

Our Company, thru our reseller had the G13 option added to our posting, and if you figure your time it was money very well spent...

Thanks For the looks, I spoke with our reseller as I have seen suggested here many times and they helped me out, again...

for any one who may be interested we used a misc integer to reverse the "Dcalc " used for the 1st canned thread pass

Below is posted code for .625-32 ID thread

N1 is fine with depth of cut set to "D.0034" and Thread height of "H.0338"(diametral value)

$A.MIN%

(A.OKU)

(PN)

(REV)

N1G50S2500M8

G0T0000M42

G97S1100M3

( 625-32 ID THREAD )

G0X.5412Z.069

Z.0578

G71X.625Z-.38B30D.0034U0.H.0338F.0313M73

Z.069

G0X20.Z20.M9

M01

N2G50S2500M8

G0T0000M42

G96S450M3

M01

N3 is a deburr pass; what I always have to try and remember, and obviously by this note I sometimes forget, is when I recall the thread cycle to Deburr the thread it MUST start in the same location as it did when we turned the thread, the only difference is the DOC I want my DOC to be about .001 less than the thread height and I run 1 spring pass, DCALC sets my DOC and I do not see how to change it...

N3G50S2500M8

G0T0000M42

G97S1100M3

( RCL N5)(DEBURR 625-32 ID THREAD )

G0X.5412Z.069

Z.05 this should be the same as N1 Z.0578

G71X.625Z-.38B30D.0034U0.H.0338F.0313M73 I want D.0034 to be D.0328 and M73 to Be M74

Z.069

G0X20.Z20.M9

(A.OKU)

(08/27/13)

M30

%

# Thread output

# --------------------------------------------------------------------------

fmt "H" 2 thddepth$ #Thread height absolute

fmt "H" 2 H1 #Diametrical Thread Depth Absolute Localized in PG76Old DEM 02/13/07

fmt "D" 2 thdfirst$ #First depth cut in thread

fmt "U" 2 thdlast$ #Last depth cut in thread

fmt "U" 2 thdfinish$ #G76 thread finish allowance

fmt "R" 3 thdrdlt #Thread R delta G92 and G76

fmt "U" 3 thd_dirx #Incremental X move for G76 mult starts

fmt "W" 3 thd_dirz #Incremental Z move for G76 mult starts

fmt "P" 5 nspring$ #Number of spring cuts

fmt "L" 5 thdpull #G76 thread pull off

fmt 5 thdang #G76 threading angle

#fmt "I" 5 thdang #G76 threading angle

fmt "F" 2 thdlead$

fmt "D" 2 dcalc #D output calculated value

# --------------------------------------------------------------------------

pg76old #G76 threading old style

H1=thddepth$*2 #DEM 02/13/07

dcalc = ((thddepth$ / 2) / 6) + 0.002

pbld, n$, *sthdgcode, pfxout, pfzout, *thdang, *dcalc, *thdfinish$, *H1, *thdlead$, "M73", e$

Thanks everyone,

I know about the modal G2, my post said "Thread mill output to out put G2 and or G3 with Z like below" the below sample was what I wanted and had done manually,

"linerize helix" is unchecked." was the answer

Have a Safe 4TH Everyone

Is there a way to get Thread mill output to out put G2 and or G3 with Z like below vs the Long hand XYZ linear type cuts

G43G54X-1.031Y-.8121Z.1H8T9M4

G1Z.028F40.

G1G42D8X-.949Y-.8121

G2X-.949Y-.8121Z-0.0033I-.082

Z-.0346I-.082

Z-.0659I-.082

Z-.0972I-.082

Z-.1285I-.082

Z-.1598I-.082

Z-.1911I-.082

Z-.2224I-.082

Z-.2537I-.082

Z-.285I-.082

G1G40X-1.031Y-.8121

G0Z.2

I accidently posted in Wrong Topic this is for "System Origin" sorry everyone...

I had a hard time with this but found as long as I brought in my stock in the Top View of Mastercam Views, and then Create WCS and views as needed, complete my 1st operation Programming

run Verify and get things as I want them, I then Exit Verify set my WCS back to Mastercam Default "Top" and run Verify again, and now when complete save the STL, when you return to Mastercam for your next operation with a new WCS the stock will be repositioned to suit just like your Part File

I had a hard time with this but found as long as I brought in my stock in the Top View of Mastercam Views, and then Create WCS and views as needed, complete my 1st operation Programming

run Verify and get things as I want them, I then Exit Verify set my WCS back to Mastercam Default "Top" and run Verify again, and now when complete save the STL, when you return to Mastercam for your next operation with a new WCS the stock will be repositioned to suit just like your Part File

This is a bit trivial but I find myself deleting in my editor the Start Extension, X or Y line and Just leave the End Extension.

I typically select a contour, rather than drawing more geometry I will use the Start End Extension (.1) to avoid plunging into material.

Cut this 2.0 long face on Y0.

Rapid to X1.1(.1 Start Extension)Y-.25(1/4 Leadin Perpendicular)

G1Z-

G41Y0D

X1.(I delete this Line)

X-1.(I delete this line)

X-1.1(.1End Extension)

G40Y-.25

G0Z

Also for machining other than 2d type contours do you have to draw the tool and holder as the tool to verify the holder?

Thanks Forum

This is a bit trivial but I find myself deleting in my editor the Start Extension, X or Y line and Just leave the End Extension.

I typically select a contour, rather than drawing more geometry I will use the Start End Extension (.1) to avoid plunging into material.

Cut this 2.0 long face on Y0.

Rapid to X1.1(.1 Start Extension)Y-.25(1/4 Leadin Perpendicular)

G1Z-

G41Y0D

X1.(I delete this Line)

X-1.(I delete this line)

X-1.1(.1End Extension)

G40Y-.25

G0Z

Also for machining other than 2d type contours do you have to draw the tool and holder as the tool to verify the holder?

Thanks Forum

Thanks 5axisGuy for asking,

I did not get this figured out yet...

Oku OSP Lathe using Cutter Comp "In Control" I need 6 Place Tool Numbers not just the 4 I am getting, can you point me to the location in the post where I should be looking to make this change?

N11 G50 S1800 M8

G0 T0000 M42 Would Like to See T000000 only on tools using Comp

G96 S300 M3

( LT 16NR)(QUALIFY Z TO CTR LINE)(TOOLNOSE RAD COMP)(RGH BORE -.006 )

G41 G0 X1.7 Z.15

X1.68

Z-.075

G1 X1.78 F.002

Z-.1222

X1.7484 Z-.1314

G2 X1.7324 Z-.1452 I.016 K-.0139

G1 Z-.2443

Thank You Forum

I have to mention that the 40 IPM is adjusted by the control to maintain Chip load so the actual adjusted feed is ~10.7IPM