2ak762 Greetings to hot Vikings! Imho, 5 axial check - a unique weak element of this excellent control.

In a mode "test run" 5 axial verification works for all without problems?

2Winnie teh Pooher A ja malo smutru telek, no horosho znaiu istoriju. Pri sovremennom razvitii videomontaja eto smeshno. Istoria otnoshinija ameriki k nam vsegda loj i podlost. Nikto zdes ne lubit kommi, kommi ushli, a amerika ostalas takoi je. Nas uje zagnali v ugol i nam uje nechego teriat... Gruzini rezali osetin v 20 godu, rezali v 90-h i vot seichas toje samoje, eto mne rasskazali druzia osetini 15 let nazad. Nakazanije grusini poluchili v ochen miagkoi forme. Predstavliau deistvia merikanov v podobnoi situatcii, tipa Vietnam chto-to bil bi. Poka chto mi nikogo ne vooruzhaem, poka chto... V otlichie on ameriki. A voobche pro merikanov - "zhadnost fraera zgubila". PS. naverno luchshe govorit v private, a to zabanijat moderatori za tarabarschinu

2Rickster JB son or father? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2Winnie teh Pooher URL closed... --------------------------- Izvini za zamudontcev, eto ya v oftope s odnim iz-za osetii ctcepilsa. gruzini-padli davili tankami detei i jenchin.

I never said, that this existing method is lack Mcam. About c-hook - it would not be desirable to trouble you as now Mcam to me it is not accessible. If you will not complicate, simply shortly describe a principle of action of it c-hook in words.

Hi, Alex! I not absolutely meant it, it is a little difficult to me to explain, as I have no big colloquial practice. For example, in Pmill there is an alternative method, I can work with toolpath as with wire geometry, could cut, glue, transform it almost "manually" and as it is as much as possible convenient me. In Mcam you generate toolpath, in backplot you can keep it as wire geometry only for the analysis. And after all it would be possible and to provide return converting of geometry in toolpath. Editing toolpath in Mcam less flexible, than geometry editing. And I would like, that and in Mcam toolpath It was edited by the same means, as geometry. It only a wish. 2Winnie teh Pooher On mine it is 3+2? And a detail case. In mould 5-axial processing is more with surfaces.

I perfectly know all possibilities MCAM on editing toolpath, but to understand flexibility of such approach as in Pmill, it is necessary to try simply. Delicate work with geometry is more more convenient than with toolpath, believe. МСАМ much more from it would win. But if is not present, means is not present. It not advertising attempt, and simply to transfer a wish advantage of other system in MCAM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kak ti ponimaesh, pro zamudontcev eto vsego lish shutka. Kstati, moya kontora ochen plotno rabotaet s Israilem, mi rabotaem na Iscar :-) Ne obijaisa, OK?

The friend, you has not attentively read a question. How to keep geometry, I know (аж 17 лет). I try to compare different CAM. For example, at DELCAM with toolpath I work as with geometry, that is I can flexibly do all operations of editing and To keep changed toolpath in a project tree. Here it would be quite good, that and in МСАМ there would be such possibility.I have in view of editing possibility toolpath as geometry. ------------------------- Nu, zamudontcev vezde hvataet. :-) Oni vedut sebia kak moskvichi v provincii. No est i normalnie. Ti davno tut?

I am sorry for probable repetition of a question. Whether there is a possibility in МСАМ to convert geometry back in toolpath? For example, in backplot remains toolpath as geometry, the geometry as to me conveniently is edited, and then the changed geometry back in toolpath is converted?