Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

balnh

Verified Members
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by balnh

  1. 59 minutes ago, #Rekd™ said:

    Did you try Multi-Axis Pocketing toolpath?

    I don’t have a multi-axis liscense. I ran the parts no problem, roughed with optirough with axis sub.  My question was why does the generic 5 axis post break up the c axis motion so much with Axis sub toolpaths. My generic Haas 4 axis post posts nice short Nc code. I figured it was generic 5 axis post limitation. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Like 1
  2. 9 minutes ago, JParis said:

    Without seeing the geometry it's impossible to say but I wonder if this is something rolled/unroiled geometry could help with...

    I did unroll the geometry, created a flat surface from the wireframe. The code posted from the 4th axis haas post I have is short and sweet. That’s subbing the Y for A. 

  3. I have a simple toolpath that’s posting with many breaks in the C axis motion. I am using generic Fanuc 5 axis post. Subbing x axis for C on a table-table AC machine. I did a search and read about brk_mv_head and brk_max_ang. I set them to 1 and -40 respectively. Did not change output. I tried different combos and didn’t affect output at all. I downloaded the newest 5 axis post from the Mastercam website and got the exact same results. I posted with 4axis haas post and got perfect nc code. I have come across this in the past and I was only doing some deburring and didn’t think twice, this toolpath is a flow line so it’s taking about 30 c axis moves to move about 60 deg or arc. Just mildly annoying but the machine will run the program. Is this something in the post that can be fixed? 
     

    Thanks

  4. Shop I work in has a Matsuura With Siemens 840 control on it. Never had the need to run any macros on it but I plan to convert some Fanuc macros to run on his machine. It’s not running in Siemens Mode so it’s just running Fanuc/Yasnac g code. I started to convert the variables from From #100 to Y_[100] format. The arithmetic and Other functions seem self explanatory. My main question is What’s the format for an address like Z#100 or X#101? If anybody can point me on the right direction I appreciate it. 

  5. 47 minutes ago, Werktuigbouwer said:

    Try the following:

    Look at the sextaux$  and sextsub$ line

    
    pheader$
       result = setncstr(two, spathnc$ + snamenc$ + sextnc$)
    
    psub_st_s$
          result = fclose(spathaux$ + snameaux$ + sextaux$)
          snameaux$ = drs_str(two, sub_prg_no$)
          sextaux$ = ".nc"
          result = setncstr(two, spathaux$ + snameaux$ + sextaux$)
     
    psub_st_m$
          result = fclose(spathsub$ + snamesub$ + sextsub$)
          snamesub$ = drs_str(two, main_prg_no$)
          sextsub$ = ".nc"
          result = setncstr(two, spathsub$ + snamesub$ + sextsub$)

    Thanks. That did it. I appreciate the help. 

    • Like 1
  6. I’m not familiar with that alloy. For pure niobium I would use carbide if I could, and ramping not plunging. I treat it like 316. Drilling with high speed drills just kind pushed the material and left a huge mushroom. Fortunately I only have to go -.125 deep so I circle milled the thru holes. 


  7. Here’s how to go all G154 from MPmaster 

         if haas,

                  [

                  p_wcs = workofs$ - five        #G154 P1 to P99

                  "G154", *p_wcs

                  #g_wcs = workofs$ + 104        #G110 to G129

                  #*g_wcs

                  ]

    You can download the post from this site

    HTH

  8. I’ve done a fair amount of small electronic packaging out of this stuff. For endmills I used 4fl Altin or Tialn coated. 150-200 SFM IIRC. 
     High copper content isn’t bad at all like 70/30 or 80/20 WCu. It’s a tad abrasive. 90/10 is very abrasive. The higher copper alloys I’ve drilled with regular Hss no problem but the 90/10 wore out the corners pretty badly. 

    • Like 1
  9. 31 minutes ago, htm01 said:

    i get that all the time from one operator,

    "something's wrong with your program"

    ooook , let's check your tool offsets, your fixture offsets, are you running the correct program, did you even read your set up sheet ?

    My favorite is when someone blames the machine for acting up.

    “ I added -.020 to the wear comp and it’s not opening up.”
    Then I take a stroll over to the machine and see that he’s been putting the value in Length wear. This has happened twice.

    • Like 1
  10. 2 hours ago, OVodov said:

    Many years ago we used macro for that.

    So coordinates of center of rotation was kept in G58.

    The macro took coordinates of part G54 or G55 calculates according to G58 and rewrite new coordinates for each position to G59.

    We used it in another software but when i asked In House Solution they made similar postpsossesor for 4 axis.

     

    On 2/20/2020 at 3:49 AM, Günther Massimo - GMCCS said:

    usually this is an option and musst be activated in your controll. However, if you don't have this option at all, you can achive a dynamic workoffset with a macro.

    I don’t want to hijack this thread but I’ve been thinking about doing this for our trunnion. Is it as straight forward as solving for new point and overwriting offset or using G52 and shifting current Workoffset? Which order of solving if rotations don’t intersect?

     My A Axis Z is -.0045 below C axis and Y-.0008. I thought about the math to figure points but my mind just stops at a certain point when I think about this shift.  Right the now programming with COR the post handles this shift and everything is sub .001.

  11. 6 hours ago, cncappsjames said:

    Ok @Leon82,

    1. Press the button that has 9 filled boxes (looks like a negative of Tic-Tac-Toe)
    2. Press File Manager on the touchscreen. This brings up Windows Explorer
    3. On the left pane of explorer scroll down to the D:\ drive and double tap on it
    4. Navigate to D:\FANUC\iHMI\MTB\CNCOpera\Setting
    5. Double tap on Setting_Data.txt open with Word Pad (or notepad if you prefer)
    6. Scroll down to the following;

    [Actual_Feedrate]

    Max_Scale-Markings_Val=40000

    Change 40000 to 1575

    Tap File, Save, and save the file. 

    Close out of Word Pad (or Notepad). Close out of Explorer. Navigate back to your CNC screen. You may need to go to another screen to get the display to refresh. Hope that helps. 

     

    As to the keyboard not keeping up... I guess I type slower. LOL I did notice the computer doesn't seem to be quite as responsive as a dedicated PC or dedicated CNC. I'm going to do a little more testing between Christmas and New Years and see what I can figure out. 

     

     

    Will this work on a robodrill with 31i B5? 

  12. Colin I did some testing and got the MR1 to work by changing the lim trip variables to 45. It works great on jobs I am currently running. During testing I tried MR6=10.  with MI8=3 Got no additional safe level z retracts. The upper and lower z limit variables  are set to 0.0 and use_stk_typ is set to 2.

    I tried MI7=1., MI=8., and MR=10.  and it did post with the MR6 retract Z10. but also add an additional Z0. Approach.  Any thoughts?

     

    Thanks for your time man I appreciate it

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...