Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

ckwhite

Verified Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ckwhite

  1. Tony35 is a genius. I didn't have perp entry turned on. Thanks brotha!!
  2. I am threadmilling, but my okuma post doesn't output G41 when I put the compensation type on "wear". When I switch the machine def to our mitsubishi HMC, it outputs correctly. Any help would be appreciated. I did a search but couldn't find anything telling me how to correct the post. Thanks
  3. What I have done in the past is have 2 MCX files. 1 for setup and 1 for production. Only problem is that I have two files to change if I want to make changes to the program. I would like for Mastercam to copy/mimic the operations exactly just in different orders.
  4. I was wondering how other people do this.... I have a two station program, put part on station 1 then flip to station 2. I don't want to have multiple tool changes so I jump from station to station with the same tool. During setup this is very aggravating (cutting air). So I would like to post the operations in a particular order for setup only, and keep the operations order for production. How can I do this? Transform without moving anything just copy? Maybe batch? Thanks.
  5. Bryan, That is how I normally do it. Have multiple models mounted to fixtures on the tombstone. The only drawback is in verify you can't see the progression of the part. I think that is the easiest, less confusing, way to do it. And it will let you know of any interference with the fixture's. Thanks, All!
  6. Cobra, That is exactly what I want to do. I don't want to have to set multiple work offsets at the machine. The best I can figure I need to know the distance and orientation from 0,0 to each fixture. Then have a WCS for each position. And each WCS would have to be moved and rotated (based on actual position and orientation). Am I correct?
  7. So I gather that it is a bad idea or is very difficult to move the WCS for each side of the part and still get the correct B axis move. So I can't watch the progression of the part through each position. Correct?
  8. Scott, I do all my Horizontal programming looking at the part from the spindle's perspective (Z) as if it were vertical. This is how my dealer set me up. I would like to only have 1 fixture offset to simplify setup. If I were to use more offsets, are you suggesting that I move the B axis and set B0 for each offset? I think that would work just more setup time. Joe, The example isn't exactly what I am doing, but each position will have multiple B moves. THIS PART WOULD BE SO MUCH EASIER WITH A 5 AXIS MACHINE...
  9. Thanks again Andre' Does any one else have an opinion... marting? Eric Wenger? cobra95kev ?
  10. Thanks Andre', So there isn't a way to have only have one model in my program and have the post output B moves by moving my WCS as previously asked.
  11. The more I look at it the more I think it is too difficult. Or maybe I am going about it the wrong way. Could someone care to explain how to do this... Thanks,
  12. Correction.... It doesn't post the code correctly. All my operations output B0. Am I doing something wrong. My operations are.... WCS/TP/CP=position 1 for B0, WCS/TP/CP= position 2 for B90, But all post out B0.
  13. Will the code output B axis moves?
  14. Thanks, My only fear is that It may get too confusing. And only I would be able to understand it.
  15. Thanks, My only fear is that It may get too confusing. And only I would be able to understand it.
  16. I have a part that will be ran in 4 fixtures. 1 fixture on each side of a tombstone doing 1/4 of the work. In your opinion is it better to copy the model to 4 positions around a tombstone or could/should I move the WCS for each toolpath. The only reason I would like to move the WCS is so I can see the progression of the part in verify. Hopefully I have explained what I mean. Thanks in advance,
  17. FYI I decided to created a peck tap cycle. Instead of adding peck to my rigid tap cycle. This made more since to me.
  18. I don't understand how to get the post to not output a Q when I don't want it to peck. Fanuc control MPSV-400 I think is my post. Any help would be great.
  19. Thanks guys, I haven't used point toolpath before. It works great!!
  20. I am needing to counterbore a hole that I can't get too straight on. There is a flange directly above part of the counterbore dia. I need to come down to the top of the stock, move over in X or Y and counterbore the hole, then move back before rapiding out. I hope I have explained well enough. Thanks MX2 MR2 MILL LEVEL 2
  21. Thanks guys, But the output code never changed when I changed the axis label in the machine definition. I had a time trying to figure it out but I did! For those that care, I changed the following line in my post: FROM code: # --------------------------------------- # Toolchange / NC output Variable Formats # --------------------------------------- fmt A 11 cabs #C axis position fmt A 14 cinc #C axis position fmt A 4 indx_out #Index position TO code: fmt B 11 cabs #C axis position fmt B 14 cinc #C axis position fmt B 4 indx_out #Index position Thanks for your help
  22. My geometry is positioned correctly. I rotate the Gview around the Y axis and save it. WCS= Top Tplane= rotated view Construction plane= rotated view
  23. Sorry, its a generic okuma 4x mill post. and I am running X2 MR2

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...