Vista is BAD FROM SECURITY POINT OF VIEW

[Fig sign]

CONSIDER THIS :

http://htmlfixit.com/index.php?p=993

http://www.webroot.com/company/pressroom/p...weaknesses.html

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061002-7875.html

http://software.silicon.com/os/0,39024651,39164485,00.htm

[Jeff Kemper]

Is not WinXP 64 bit better than WinXP, security wise?

[Fig sign]

More complex Windows OS mor evulnerable

I don`t like the idea of Windows defender ,security center and so on.

I think Microsoft is not capable to look critically

over the monster it created .

It simply not able to make good antivirus or spam

defenter .

They can hire legions of programmers and antivirus

researchers ,every effort will die in beurocracy of montrous corporation .

If you ever used Microsoft antivirus in the days of DOS 6 you know what I mean .

No Windows system was ever safe .

What i think is old as computer -

Windows has bad architecture .

It was never made from scratch ,it was always a chase over someone and never strong enough .

It never follows standarts .

It is not fully Possix compatible to this day or say tcp/ip .

[Jeff Kemper]

they could learn from Sun Tzu.

[Tinhman]

===============================

No Windows system was ever safe

===============================

[Craig Madsen from CM3D]

No computer from ANY software point of view is safe.

 

The only secure systems are not connected to the internet, and usually are not connected to in company isolated networks either.

 

Just the fact that a computer is 'online' opens them to many types of attacks.

[Fig sign]

No computer from ANY software point of view is safe.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

True .

Bad security ,problems with TCP/IP ,PoSSix (May be Microsoft don`t care ) ,OpenGL support .

But what are Vista strong points ?

Aero ?

What all this fuss worth of ?

People ,become reasonable ,install Xp on new computers ,do not give your It possibility to install Vista and be happy.