Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
Our lathe guy, is having the reverse problem, can't get the retract to work,
long hand cycle rapids to last depth without clearance,
ie
G1Z-1.75
G0Z.25
G0Z-1.75
G1X-2.0
G0Z.25
G0Z-2.
G1Z-2.25
NEED
GOZ-1.65
G1Z-2.0
G0Z.25
G0Z-1.9
G1Z-2.0
etc,
any help, we've tried using control manager setting, ie turning off drill cyles and still no effect
the rectract will just not work to give some feed clearance
we are using X3
help,
in X MR2, I could create a curve on an edge and the curve would be a single spline chain,
but when doing the same thing in X3, it makes small sections and doesn't close the curve
am I missing a setting in X3 that will do the same
break angle doesn't fix the problem
any ideas?
thanks guys,
we downloaded the spec for UNJ thds, and yes Dave you are 100% correct !
we looked at a lathe tool, but time is a factor, single point threadmilling is extremly slow
to mill the internal thread, you must check that the tool dia. is small enough to ensure that the thread groove width remains within spec.
otherwise the part will be scrap or if possible welded, and remachined
thanks,
i found a thread on another forum,
indicating that the internal thread DOES NOT require cresting, it seem that only the external thread needs cresting,
kennametal book has specific inserts for UNJ external thds but use std UN inserts for internal threads, makes me wonder?
however I need to get the spec. to confirm the acutal thread requirements for the internal thread form
I'll keep diggin'
thanks
has anyone milled this thread before
it's a military spec thread with controlled root crest, is it possible to mill this thread?
i need to find the right tools that can do it if possible, or is it only possible by turning?
it's also about 8" deep into the part.
any ideas
My mcam reseller sent me a chook that allow you to assign each session of mcam to a specific core
works great, reduces load on each core
the chook is called CPU.DLL
ask you reseller for it
jm2c
John,
you brought up a very good point, I'll have to check on that
Thad,
I always seem to have problems with the boolean add/remove feature, screw it up more often than not
Just need to use it more often I guess or look at the examples in the book to get a better handle on it
Thad,
I tried that option of filling in the pocket and extruding another pocket.
the pocket is open with tapered walls with the open end thru muliple steps around an od.
kind of hard to explain and i can't seem to paste the image of the pocket
in any case this gives me some options to try
I'll still have to wait on customer approval
thanks
I know it's better not to re-invent the wheel,
i did send the request for change to the customer, but I may not rec'v the model in time, to machine the pc.
but I totally agree that the customer should change the model, because if for any reason someone ask's/complains, "who authorized this?"
you know how that goes.
better to volley this back over the net
thanks guys
I have a inventor file solid (from customer) that imports with no solid history, just one whole solid
how do I remove features?
there is a pocket in the solid that needs dimensional changes and some of the original pocket is bigger
i need to remove all of these pockets and add the new pocket
any ideas?
We have 3 seats, l1, m1, m3, on a nethasp,each one uses command line switches to control who gets what, but however they still do not work all the time
whoever loads first in the morning gets the L3 seat, very frustrating as I'm the only one who needs it
jm2c
we're currently using x mr1 mill, 2 stations
and v9.1 lathe
current late posts don't work well with mcamX, even with conversion, so our lathe guy doesn't use X
we're getting new computers and the company want's all stations update to the latest version.
our posts are legacy from v8.11, and require a lot of manual code edits ( conversions work ok with v9 and X mr2, still lots of manual code editing).
we have fanuc, seimens, heidenhain 5ax and burny controls
To update the posts is it better to modify the existing v8.11 posts or just start from scratch using mpmaster for x2 mr2?
i'm using surface rgh contour, i've tried the flowline but can't get a circle type leadin/out to the side of the part, it circles along z axis i want xy plane circle leadin/out
is the gap setting in the op manager or from mcam config settings
I've just started using surfaces since we got a 5ax machine
is there a good example for surface blending and the types of extra geom. required to get it to work as expected
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.