Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

kool

Customers
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kool

  1. 9 hours ago, medaq said:

    Got some pricing from Autodesk about renewals. And sad they want more for one seat.

     

    Are you talking about the yearly maintenance renewal?  or they want more from everyone who has an existing CAMplete Licence? I believe the yearly maintenance was $1500-2000 last year. what change?

     

    6 hours ago, cncappsjames said:

    We've got a few customers that use Vericut or NC Simul for the collision check and CAMplete for the post. No need for maintenance in that case...

    James, What would people do who have Cublex? I don't think Vericut cut support those Mill-Turn. I guess we can use one VMC  for simulating the mill portion and another for the Lathe portion.

  2.  

    Hi Pete,

    Thanks for some insight. I have a few more questions.

     

    "MC creates a different View-sheet/Level/Plane for every view in the step 242 file that contains annotations ... not for every dimension."

    This may not be a Master Cam issue, But this is what is happening in my case. It could be the STEP242 file the customer send us. The file was created from NX CAD system.

    Is there an option in NX not to create a view for each dimension?

    May I send you the file and you can test it on your side?

    The sample file attached above, Is this a NX native file format or Step242.

    Can you share a native NX file format or Step242 for me to test?

     

  3. Our customers are pushing us to use the STEP 242 file format. I have done some testing on MC2021. When I import step 242 files, MC creates a different View-sheet/Level/Plane for every dimension in the step 242 file. I had one part that had over a thousand dimensions. It took forever to open that file. 

    Is there a better way to import step 242 files with MBD data into MCX?  

    Is there any hope that MC will do anything to improve this?

  4. On 12/12/2016 at 1:05 PM, N.Skinner said:

    Unfortunately, due to the nature of what I manufacture, I cannot share a file. And unfortunately it sounds like I'm the only one with this problem.

     

    I believe it must be a post error so I am contacting MasterCam now. 

     

    The fact that I can post and It will show up correct - close file - next day open file - and the ref points will be missing from the program next time I post. Its sporadic and can't be trusted...

     

  5. I have seen this happen in most toolpaths I use. Mainly Contour toolpaths because that's what I mainly use. Put simply, Lets say I turn on Z home ref points for both approach and retract. I input 6.0 inches. When I post, depending on the day or hour of the day, the 6.0 will show up or won't show up. It's a roll of the dice.

     

    I have seen that happens to me few times. Most of the time I see this problem with approach. Its checked and value is there, But approach moves wouldn't post and doesn't show up in back plot. I usually have to end up re-doing that tool path from scratch as work around. 

  6. Thanks guys, that check box (transform into WCS) in interface was one of the reason for my problem. unchecking it solves my problem, But there is secondary solution I found out when I was working on test program to put it on FTP. 

     

    I don't know about you guys, but when I create a Transform operation I don't worry about setting my WCS(top) or T-plane(front). I guess when I created  original Transform operation, WCS was set to front. that is way it was rotated 90 deg.

     

    When I was creating Transform operation for test program, WCS was set to top and it's simulating fine even though that box was check.

     

    Any idea why that box is there? I could not find any info in help menu.

  7. Does machine simulation in MC2017/X9 support transform rotate operation and simulate properly?

     

    I have build a new virtual machine (5x horizontal table "B" head "A") for machine simulation.

     

    It simulating regular tool path properly, but I m having little issue with simulating transform rotate tool paths. I have attached 2 pictures to explain the issue below.

     

    Fixture/stock should only rotate around -Y- axis like horizontal machine. and my tool and spindle should be in horizontal position.

     

    what I m missing?

     

    post-22284-0-81033700-1481335293_thumb.png

     

    This is how fixture/stock and spindle looks with regular tool path, that how it should be.

     

    post-22284-0-10961300-1481335391_thumb.png

     

    This is how it looks with transform rotate tool path.

     

     

     

  8. I m having problem cutting these slots. Just think this part as giant heat sink.

     

    Material is Alpase K-100 Alum tooling plate

    Part Size 12 x 13 x 3 " thick

    Slots are 25x .236 wide 2.7 " deep with full radius on bottom

     

     

    I m using a 8" dia .236 thick slitting saw stagger brazed tip with full radius from Lexington Cutter. It s not working that well.

    Surface finish is terrible.  and the cutter is putting to much stress in to the material that part bow out of flatness and walls get taper. This material should be preety stable and not move like that.

     

    How would you do these slots? any new slitting saw recommendation please.

     

    Thanks in advance.

     

    post-22284-0-94949900-1424885653_thumb.jpg

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...