Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

MrFish

Verified Members
  • Posts

    533
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by MrFish

  1. Thanks for all the tips guys. I have gotten to something more acceptable. I think most of the problem is due to the fact I am comming up against vertical walls.

     

    Yes vertical walls cause a lot of issues especially with the older tool paths. We always put pressure on our mold designers to have draft on all walls even if it doesn't require it just to help with surfacing toolpaths.

     

    p.s. hope the acquisition of Race Face by Fox doesn't affect your employment or the great products you guys make.

  2. Normal drill and contour operations, program one hole/slot for each diameter.

    Transform, Rotate toolpath about centerline of part.

     

    Then you only have to create 3 different planes instead of 64.......

     

    This is how I would do it too. What didn't work ?

  3. You need to build a fence all the way around the yard, then build another fence half the width of your lawnmower inside of that. That way went you run your lawnmower and say, "Hey, I don't want you to cut this check fence," and it says, "check surfaces are gonna be treated as mow surfaces, beyoch," you still have the outside fence left when you're done.

     

    Just try to avoid building any gaps, i.e. no gates or doors.

     

    Lol , love it

  4. No, sorry we don't. We have Capto here, and I used Capto at CWF. I've never used the KM system.

     

    Have you used it at all?

    No not personally , yeah understand the availability thing , although looking through the KM tooling catalogue I can't see us ever needing anything different to what is already available. (that's probably a dangerous comment)

  5. As the subject implies I am looking for opinions, good or bad for either KM40 or Capto tooling for tooling up our new Mori NL2500 lathe.

    Currently have a very good working relationship with our local Kennametal rep  and very little experience with the Sandvik one so leaning towards KM but would like to here what people think.

     

    Thanks

  6. MrFish and Murlin, we all have been there where are told to make something we know is really not practical, but someone thinks it is a good idea. He needs to make this part. Now if it will make what is needed after it is made is not his responsibility. I have scrapped $800k of part doing what I was told to do, that I said would not work. I was ordered to make it and I made it with my objections noted. I always tell people "if I say it is wrong you might want to listen not that I am the expert, but do you really want me to be right in this case?" I have been wrong before and will probably will be wrong again part of being human, but been right many more times than I have been wrong and that should count for something.

     

    This is true, and we have probably all been there I was just making an observation.

  7. Yes, I know what you mean. For C and Y axis though, simply modelling the jaws and tool holder should suffice. In all honesty, with all the C and Y axis lathes I have programmed, I've never had to go further than backplot. That, and once you have programmed a few jobs you get a good feel for it anyway :)

     

    I was going to say that you have Vericut for checking anything tricky anyway, but I clicked that your setup doesn't allow an additional machine :(

     

    Yeah exactly, but we wouldn't have Vericut at all if we hadn't gone the limited version. Was almost half price :guitar:

  8. Not sure. I don't use it. To be honest, for anything other than a B axis Mill Turn/Multi Turret/Multi Spindle lathe, backplot does just fine over Machine Simulation or Vericut.

     

    Might pay to check with your reseller.

     

    :)

     

    Hi Mike

     

    Thanks for the reply. We are thinking it might be a good solution for checking for clearance issues when programming tricky parts with driven tools and Y axis movement. If modelled and setup correctly it in theory could pickup any potential crashes between the often overlooked areas of this type of programming. i.e. tools in the turret that aren't actually being verified to machine guards, chuck etc

  9. Anyone used the new Holder clearance, with multi axis tilt away function in the highspeed toolpaths ? It's not available for me , is greyed out, only the standard gouge checking is available. I have a multiaxis machine and post selected. Any ideas ?

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...