pullo
-
Posts
464 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
eMastercam Wiki
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by pullo
-
-
GPUs are used for number crunching mainly in Bit coin mining, for us it's just spinning a shaded representation of the parts either smoothly or not . To prove this , just do the Benchmark 3.0 with the window minimized or not (i.e. no Grahics to calculate ). there should be no time difference. This is not the best example for proving this point, as maybe turning on/off hardware acceleration would be a more of a difference maker ....
Gracjan
-
Your part (the plate looking part )is even simpler as an internal radius is inside the machining area. You must remember to force the toolpath to be made by applying the right overthickness.
I was not able to induce a toolpath creation using old school pencil, but high speed pencil with an overthickness of 6 mm gave me a nice toolpath.
However, since we are talking molds , those "wavy " cut entrances and exits will make the guy who has to polish this surface curse you till the end of time.
You need here a toolpath with one entry and one exit. Here the right choice is High speed spiral, especially since your part is circular.
Gracjan
-
-
scallop is not a very efficient toolpath in your case , as scallop does not follow the topology of your geometry , it offsets the limiting boundaries and this offseting usually has nothing to do with the best way to machine your part .
So my silver bullet is usually pencil , unlimited . Arc filtering etc is totally off , This toolpath will need internal radii in the machining area for the toolpath to start to "follow" the natural shape of your part ( along an internal / external fillet rather than across it fro example ). But in many cases there are ways to induce the toolpath to follow the topology
of the part.
I think my pic proves my point way better than 7000 words here . I know that I machined more than you asked for , but as that area near the internal fillet has to be machined anyway ,might as well do it in one go .
Gracjan
- 1
-
Tim ,I sent your file to Ken Earman from CNC Soft and he'll forward it to the appropriate person, so hopefully we will hear more about this from them.
Gracjan
-
Jeff , those things are bacteria nests ! There is an internal cavity you can't clean properly and people are spitting into it !
And stick to the topic
This was two for two ! I mean the second suggestion I made was so whacky .....
Gracjan
-
Me, I'm a V3 , but it's the constant sniffing around that does the trick And the Verisurf thing is like a few months old knowledge
Here is my moment of enlightenment :
https://www.emastercam.com/forums/topic/95380-is-there-any-hope-for-this-program/
my personal favorite in this thread is the "magic" directory ......never got an answer to that question
Gracjan
-
ok, will do ,
that was two for two today !
-
Can I send this file of yours to CNC soft ? and a link to this thread for figuring out ...
Gracjan
-
WHAT ??????????????????? I'm getting good at this
Gracjan
-
It's a very unlikely scenario this will work, but just to rule it out .....
Gracjan
-
-
-
File /Configuration and the bottom line says "current" , choose the metric version
Gee
-
yessir
-
One more thing Tim , since I also do mold design, in order to prevent a possible mishap with the file failing, I save the main ASSY in files that as I progress get their name ending in a number that gets bumped. So if a file fails , I have a trail of files. ...... But since you said You'd have lost a day and a half , that would not make up for redoing the whole file, so
you also leave a trail of files (6-27 , 6-25 .... etc) , I'm guessing
Gracjan
-
Since anything can be anything , I started out in a metric version and as the file is from Gringolandia , mcam changed to Inches and then opened it faultlessly....
Tim , just to rule it out , switch to a metric version and open the file from there ?
Gracjan
-
This is the most stupid saying in the English language , but clean as a whistle
Gracjan
-
Yeah , I also learned it the hard way . The file that I had that got corrupted had the burn coordinates and I had the electrode already machined . So up the creek and no coordinates. Then I remembered , that my electrode machine post posts out my WCS / Toolplane origin post , so I EDMed the cavity using the info from the NC - file documentation and then manually reconstructed the machining files ( about 1.5 hrs lost ).... For some reason I wandered into Verisurf and there it was : The "merge CAD files" function, tried it and it worked ! Too late too little for the previous mishap, but the knowledge ready for the next time ....
Gracjan
-
..... although it took a long time to open , I actually had my line read : I can confirm , the file is dead .... and then the screen became live again.
Gracjan
-
-
Ok , so in a matter of 4 minutes , you installed for the first time Verisurf and successfully used it to your advantage and then you researched file sharing and sent me the file!
I WANT THE SALAD YOU'RE EATING !
Gracjan
-
Yup , I'm da man ( dance of joy being performed here as I write ) . Glad to have helped .
Gracjan
- 1
-
yes You actually do , so be careful .
I'm thinking : ID thread , (always Right hand ) , Top to Bottom = Conventional
ID thread ( ) Bottom to Top = Climb
and with OD thread the Bottom to Top = Conventional...
Gracjan
Pitch in your little gems that make mcam life easier
in Industrial Forum
Posted
2019 has now proven to be a very reliable version , 2018 not so much..... The out of the box version needs in my opinion a lot seasoning , especially as there are a lot of toolpaths
that are not available from the ribbons. Also the RMB out of the box is barely usable. But when you re-model the interior to your liking things really take off .
If you'd like to give it one more try , I could send you my mastercam.workspace file , along with a list of keyboard shortcuts.
A lot of the people here in Finland that I have influenced have never even tried the out of the box experience and have immediately jumped into my version of reality. I call that easy living , because it took me about 2 weeks to figure out my ground zero version and I have been for the past few years constantly improving it . As a matter of fact ,
just the other day Crazy Millman just showed off his RMB where he has all his Autocursor and Autocursor Lock functions as two sub-menus in the RMB and I intend to assimilate that .
Gracjan