Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Tool Break Detection


Jake L
 Share

Recommended Posts

It seems most people use misc integers to implement tool break detection. Would it be dumb to use a custom drill cycle?

I'd like to let the programmer make adjustments to all the variables on the tool break detect line. Ex. spindle speed, tolerance, radial offset, z safety plane, etc. But I'd hate to have the majority of my misc integers hogged by one function.

Is there a better way to implement this? Am I trying to do too much customization?

MC2023 TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With tool break detection, is it necessary to do it as a drill cycle?  I mean, if you're okay with it happening as a standalone toolpath anyway, just do it as a manual entry.   The big benefit to doing a custom drill cycle is it allows you transfer positional information to whatever you're trying to do (i.e., Probe at this XYZ), which seems unnecessary for a tool break cycle?


Or am I missing something?

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Aaron Eberhard said:

With tool break detection, is it necessary to do it as a drill cycle?  I mean, if you're okay with it happening as a standalone toolpath anyway, just do it as a manual entry.   The big benefit to doing a custom drill cycle is it allows you transfer positional information to whatever you're trying to do (i.e., Probe at this XYZ), which seems unnecessary for a tool break cycle?


Or am I missing something?

Manual entry, hadn't considered that option, thanks. No need for positional information that's all stored in the machine. 

Think I was trying to fit a round peg in a square hole. My head went "hey I know how to implement that with the post" so that's the direction I took off in. Kind of forgot to look for other options.

Thanks Aaron!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Jake L said:

Manual entry, hadn't considered that option, thanks. No need for positional information that's all stored in the machine. 

Think I was trying to fit a round peg in a square hole. My head went "hey I know how to implement that with the post" so that's the direction I took off in. Kind of forgot to look for other options.

Thanks Aaron!

You're welcome, I'm happy to be a rubber duck :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...