Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Nesting direction


Greg Facer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thanks everyone for the help on using the tool's values for depth cuts, etc. (I think I will use different tool libraries for different materials)

 

On my own, I have just figured out most of what I need to in the job setup sheet.

 

Now, the last major trick I'm trying to get good at is nesting (I have MC9 router BTW). I'm trying to get it to nest 100 rectangular pieces (w. some holes), by moving zig-zag across the X axis and up the Y axis. Actually, I'm trying to nest the toolpaths of 100 pieces.

 

But, the nesting a) only seems to want to nest first to fill up the y direction and B) doesn't want to zig and zig to minimize the cutting time.

 

Yes, cut next closest kinda works, but wanders all over the sheet. I don't see any way to nudge MC into a specific direction.

 

The direction is the most important thing I need to find, as the default forces me to know how big a sheet I need beforehand, or waste material.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Greg Facer,

plasticworks.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Hardmill, Marc

 

Transform toolpaths does what I need, which was basically how I used to handle it in my old version of MC. However, it is not nesting, so that solution defeats the purpose. IF anyone knows a trick to getting nesting to zig-zag, please let me know....I'll probably do manual positions of just the database order for now.

 

I could post a file to the FTP, but it really is just nesting an 4.4" x 2.45" rectangle in a 48" X by 40"Y sheet (this is the max of my small router table). Ideally it would fill up the 48 first and then move up the 40", allowing me to figure out what length x 48" to cut off a sheet and get my pieces out of.

 

Hmmm, one of my other ideas was to reverse the sheets X and Y values, and then transform the results of the nesting back to my actual sheet orientation...but that showed that it isn't that MC is favoring the Y direction in nesting, it is just that's the best way to cut for yeild.

 

There is irony here, because once I cut a 48" x length X off a full sheet, the scrap from the piece is garbage. So, MC is maximizing my yield from the specified size, but isn't helping me determine the best sheet size to specify! Hmmm, I think I need a little VBA or excel sheet to work out the rough sheet size, then nest to that....I think that will solve the problem.

 

Thanks! Greg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

Back again, unfortunately.

 

This time, I'm trying to nest a 10" x 13" toolpath (plus 1/8" bit, and has some holes/cut outs) to get 10 pieces from a 35" x 48" sheet size.

 

I know this works, I can (and will have to it seems) do the layout by hand, but thought it would be a good quick test of MC9 rectangular nesting. BTW the proper way to do it, if 48 is X and 35 ix Y is to have 2 rows of 10Y13X 3 each and 1 row of 13Y10X of 4.

 

MC9 will not do that, insisting on only cutting 9 pieces! But, if I set the sheets to "add additional sheets as needed", the next sheet, only partly filled, starts with the piece rotated 90 degrees, which is what I want for 1 row of the first sheet!

 

For the obvious questions: Yes, I had 90 degs in the "rotate by" box. I also tried nesting the geometry. (and yes, I had room)

 

I'll try to get the file up on FTP: ftp://www.ppcadcam.com/Mastercam_forum/MC9_files/nest.mc9

 

Thanks for any ideas. Greg Facer

Plasticworks.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lee,

 

I did get your email, and I thank you for you help. However, making 6 of one shape in the vertical and 4 of another in the horizontal is not what I had in mind as a fix. Yes, it saves time if I know before hand that I can fit things a certain way but MC won't do it.

 

....but MC should! This is a very simple operation! It is one that you can tell easily that there is a more optimum solution. But, othertimes that is more difficult, and I expect a high-end package like MC to not drop a simply nesting exercise.

 

But, Lee's suggestion seems like the best answer until the nesting works properly. I tried nesting the toolpath and a rotated copy (I had to delete the nesting sestion though, the rotated copy was picking up other junk when trying to import), win a min of 10 each. Voila, that did get the 10 yield I knew was there.

 

Les, sorry for not putting this above, but I only have rectangular nesting...and grain would not have helped, as I can't get the 10 out if grain was important (plexiglass, so it isn't).

 

But, to the MC staff, the nesting still needs work, and having a way to force the majority of the parts to nest in one direction would be a welcome addition....I have a $100 nesting program that does that.....although oddly enough it also choked on my 10 x 13 piece.

 

BTW, Lee, are you using anything beyond the standard install for nesting. The screenshot you sent was unlike any I've seen on my version, but I don't know if that is because it mine is Router vs your Mill or something else.

 

Anyways, have a good weekend everyone!

 

Greg Facer,

plasticworks.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lee,

 

It is the results screen that seems to be different. Your results seem to be in a dialogue box as part of the nesting dialogue boxes. In Router, it only uses the drawing area to plot out the results.

 

And yes, I noticed the gradient toolbar buttons too. Nice.

 

Greg

plasticworks.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi greg,

 

the 10 by 13 worked for me { got 10 } I don't have ftp so

 

my part was 10x by 13y orgin center of part

sheet was 48x by 35y

tool was .125 upcut sprial

part to part was .126

nested toolpaths, fill all sheets

min quat 11 step angle 90

 

my habit is to make part orgin the center insted of a corner {seems to help somehow}

 

hope this helps in some way

 

chimo les

 

router pro v9.1

 

I got it to fail by nesting to tool dia plus distance between parts .125 = not enough room for vertical top row

 

[ 06-27-2004, 04:12 PM: Message edited by: les ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

greg

 

with a .125 bit nested to center of bit go with .001 or .01 between parts.

 

with a .125 bit nested to dia of bit you can go as small as -.124 between parts

 

 

its nesting the toolpath wich can overlap by as much as .124 { aprox 95% of dia} and still cut good parts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les, can you explain the "make part orgin the center insted of a corner {seems to help somehow}"? I don't quite follow you.

 

BTW, I had .020 between parts on center of bit (that should have been OK)....and just tried .001, and that didn't make it work.

 

Thanks, Greg

plasticworks.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...