Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Which would you trust more?


Marshal
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm playing with the probing system on our mill, trying to learn the ins and outs of it, and I noticed a discrepancy today. Basically, when we put something in the mill we usually indicate about a hole in the center to give us our part center. Pretty basic, and we haven't had any problem with it. But I would assume the probe can do the same thing and be just as accurate, if not more accurate. So I tried it, and noticed that the center of the hole using the probed center is 0.0147" different in the X, and 0.0022" different in the Y. Which would you trust to be more accurate, the indicator or the probe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest CNC Apps Guy 1

I indicate my probe tips to within .0002 TIR.

 

YouI should calibrate the probe also. I use 2" or larger gage rings.

 

John's right though, you should not be getting anywhere near that much difference. I would venture to guess, you should see less than .0005" difference between indicator and probe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest CNC Apps Guy 1
Macro O9801 This is used to establish the probe length in its toolshank.

Macro O9802 This is used to establish the stylus off-centre values.

Macro O9803 This is used to establish the stylus ball radius values. It is suitable for all measuring cycles except O9821, O9822 and O9823.

Macro O9804 This is used to establish the vector stylus ball radiusvalues. It is suitable for all measuring cycles, including O9821, O9822 and O9823.

 

For complete calibration of a probe system, you must use macros O9801, O9802, and either O9803 or O9804.

The Renishaw calibration cycles are split into separate cycles for flexibility. If, however, the calibration feature is accurately known for both size and position, e.g. a ring gauge where the size is known, and the position is accurately found using a Dial Test Indicator, it is then possible for you to write a program which completes the full calibration procedure in one operation by calling all of the above macros.

 

Example: G65P9803D50.005Z50.S1.

COMPULSORY INPUTS Dd d = Reference ring gauge size

OPTIONAL INPUTS Zz z = The absolute Z axis measuring position when calibrating on an external feature. If this is omitted a Ring Gauge cycle is assumed.

Ss s = The work offset number which will be set. The work offset number will be updated.

S1 to S6 (G54 to G59)

S0 (External Work Offset).

S101 to S148 (G54.1 P1 to G54.1 P48) additional offsets option.

New work offset = active work offset + error.

New External offset = External offset + error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got to be kidding me.

 

A interappid in the final say.....

 

As long as the bearings are in there square.

 

I have seen times when sweeping a hole in resulted in error but only if the bearings were in at an angle.

 

Starett last word is the worst indicator on the planet if not in the universe.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alright, I'll give it a shot--if I can figure out how to calibrate it lol. Only way to learn is to do it :)

 

One thing to keep in mind. If you remove the probe from the machine, you need to replace it in the same orientation as when it was calibrated.

 

(if your prboe tip is indicated in dead zero, it shouldn't mattet. My guess is your tip is a few thou off, and if you pull the probe out and turn it around, it will be twice that amount off)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The probe is quick and handy but you just never know if the last guy on the machine bumped it hard and threw it out of calibration. :unsure:

 

Well, there's only 2 people in the company that know how to use the machine, and the other guy only uses the probe for setting the Z, so there won't be much bumping lol.

 

 

One thing to keep in mind. If you remove the probe from the machine, you need to replace it in the same orientation as when it was calibrated.(if your prboe tip is indicated in dead zero, it shouldn't mattet. My guess is your tip is a few thou off, and if you pull the probe out and turn it around, it will be twice that amount off)

 

The probe is never taken out of the machine, it's in the ATC, so it always goes in the same way, so that's not likely the issue. I just can't get the darn thing calibrated, and it's entirely possible it was never calibrated in the X and Y, since it's never been used for anything other than for setting the Z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contact Renishaw @ 847-286-9953 for a .pdf copy of their manuals for your machine/control combo. The copies should be free of charge.

FYI, if possible our operators calibrate the touch probes as well as calibrate/align the non-contact lasers on the daily basis. A lot of our operations are 30+ hours per part with probing cycles within the program so it's critical that the probes are always calibrated. But that being said, I would trust an indicator (+1 to Interapid) over a touch probe any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still getting the "part probe readings exceed maximum deviation as defined by the max spread parameter" error, even after adjusting the max spread. I wonder if the probe itself is off center? I know there's some adjustments in the probe head, but I don't want to mess with those if I can help it.

 

I honestly have no idea if this probe was ever calibrated in the first place, certainly not within the last year or two. The Z values have always worked excellent in coordination with the tool setting probe, so I think that value is accurate, but X and Y certainly aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use a .0001 indicator on the tip of the probe and spin it. Your runnout should not be more than .0002, typically. If you want it calibrated properly, you'll have to use the adjustment screw in the head. It's a tedious process, but well worth it and really pays off in the end. If your probe isn't properly calibrated, it's not much use other than getting you "close".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mechanical FTW.

I'd stick an edge finder in there. Get the center of your hole. Zero out your relative, then stick the probe in and check center.

 

And that's more or less what I've been trying to do. I've got the center of a 2" ring gauge set using an indicator, and have been trying to calibrate the probe from that. When I measure the ring gauge with the probe, I'm getting a centerpoint difference of 0.0050" in the X, and 0.0026" in the Y, and it tells me the diameter of the ring gauge is 1.98992", when it's actually 2". Seems like an awfully big error to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...