Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
To continue discussions about parametric - nonparametric CAD.
The guy that that I mentioned before - Adriaan T. swithed from MC to F360 for creating models.
I made 3 options:
1st - Area roughing - For High Feed cutters I prefer over OptiRough,
2nd - Classic Rough Parallel. It's not ideal - leaving big steps that needed to be removed.
3rd - Classic Rough Pocket.
For High Feed cutter you cannot drop your tool down like solid carbide.
I used .040" down and 70% stepover, change it to SECO catalog suggestion.
3D_TEST.mcam
I used Solidworks for years until started to work for the company which doesn’t have it.
it took me a while to get used to use MC for CAD and I hated it.
Now I do have SW but still use MC for modelling fixtures, clamps etc. It’s easy to make everything in one place. Still modelling and assembling is easier in SW.
Nobody asks MC to have full CAD functions like assembling many components or stress simulate,
Having parametric sketcher would only benefit us as programmers and safe our time.
I use 2024 and find it pretty steady, no annoying bugs so far.
There are some minor improvements to make your life easier and some improvements to make your life harder.
Updated stock is become easier since you can run simulation having updated Stock model at beginning of your ops.
Fixturing became stupidly harder to use.
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.