Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Cat 40 Offline tool length measurment


Recommended Posts

Is the flat face on the spindle the gage line? I didnt think it was because it doesnt look like a precision surface on our spindle. I am familiar with the Zoller, but I just need to do one tool. I found a spec that said 1.75" was the ggae line diameter on the taper, so i guess i could just get the distance on the cmm knowing that. I figured that had to be an easier way to do it. either on the machine or on a surface plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the flat face on the spindle the gage line? I didnt think it was because it doesnt look like a precision surface on our spindle. I am familiar with the Zoller, but I just need to do one tool. I found a spec that said 1.75" was the ggae line diameter on the taper, so i guess i could just get the distance on the cmm knowing that. I figured that had to be an easier way to do it. either on the machine or on a surface plate.

 

Yes, the flat face is BASICALLY the gage line. 1.75" is correct (for a 40 taper). But the tolerance is ±.015" in Z off of that. Since tool length offset and fixture z offset are relative, the exact number isn't really all that critical. Unless you are doing 5axis work I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's not that critical, unless you know of a reason to state otherwise. Like I said, the gage diameter of 1.75" is the critical dimension. But the face of the spindle is ±.015" from that. And like the OP said, his spindle face doesn't appear to be precision ground. What happens when you have a spindle reground? Do they also regrind the face?

 

EDIT: Those are actual questions. And keep in mind we aren't talking about dual contact stuff. Also, does anyone have a reason on why the exact gage line would be critical?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's not that critical, unless you know of a reason to state otherwise. Like I said, the gage diameter of 1.75" is the critical dimension. But the face of the spindle is ±.015" from that. And like the OP said, his spindle face doesn't appear to be precision ground. What happens when you have a spindle reground? Do they also regrind the face?

 

EDIT: Those are actual questions. And keep in mind we aren't talking about dual contact stuff. Also, does anyone have a reason on why the exact gage line would be critical?

 

Exact gage line would be best for simplifying offline presetting. Otherwise your pre-setter needs to have a configuration for each machine tool. Also if you are using Balfuff RFID chips with a tool offset stored in the chip you don't want to have to re-measure the tool if you switch it from machine to machine. In some FMS systems with shared tool magazines you would prefer the same base offset for each tool regardless of which machine it is in. I always use a ground master bar to calibrate tool probes, pre-setters and any other tool offset related measurement.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm missing something here or don't understand the statement.

 

Our Makino gage dia. and spindle nose are dead nuts. I can touch the spindle nose off any flat face, set the wpc z, pre-set the tools and go. Formerly ran Mazak HMC's for years, same set-up, 50 taper. Spindle nose to CL of rot is fixed (varied between machines a few thou). Tools were pre set off the machine, and usually good within a thou.

 

Edit: Doug beat me to it and said it more betterer, lol.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm missing something here or don't understand the statement.

 

Our Makino gage dia. and spindle nose are dead nuts. I can touch the spindle nose off any flat face, set the wpc z, pre-set the tools and go. Formerly ran Mazak HMC's for years, same set-up, 50 taper. Spindle nose to CL of rot is fixed (varied between machines a few thou). Tools were pre set off the machine, and usually good within a thou.

 

 

 

Makino is a high quality builder. They were most likely already grinding theoretical gage line to spindle face to a tight tolerance. That is not the case with all builders.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of understand where you are coming from, but;

 

Wouldn't the fixture 'Z' offset zero out the error?

For the sake of argument the tool length on your presetter is exactly 4.0000".

This is measured from the true gage line at precisely 1.750" diameter.

You have 3 identical machines.

Machine #1 gage line is exactly at spindle face, tool jogs down to top of probe, measures -16.0000"

Machine #2 gage line is +.015" from spindle face, tool jogs down to top of probe, measures -16.0150"

Machine #3 gage line is -.015" from spindle face, tool jogs down to top of probe, measures -15.9850"

 

Isn't the tool going to go to the top of probe when you program Z0 on all three?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of understand where you are coming from, but;

 

Wouldn't the fixture 'Z' offset zero out the error?

For the sake of argument the tool length on your presetter is exactly 4.0000".

This is measured from the true gage line at precisely 1.750" diameter.

You have 3 identical machines.

Machine #1 gage line is exactly at spindle face, tool jogs down to top of probe, measures -16.0000"

Machine #2 gage line is +.015" from spindle face, tool jogs down to top of probe, measures -16.0150"

Machine #3 gage line is -.015" from spindle face, tool jogs down to top of probe, measures -15.9850"

 

Isn't the tool going to go to the top of probe when you program Z0 on all three?

 

I'm not sure I follow what you are saying. However if you are using a tool probe in the machine then yes it will comp it correctly.

 

The scenario I am describing is this.

 

1. you use an offline tool pre-setter to measure the tool to exact gage line.

2. you use the machine tool spindle face to set work offset.

3. your error will be the difference in tolerance of the machine tools spindle face to actual gage line.

4. now put that tool in a different machine using the same offset and using the spindle face to set work offset. Unless the two machine have the spindle ground to the exact same tolerance then there will be error.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AHA! Now I understand. Thanks Doug! I've never used the spindle face to touch off though. I always used the surface of my edge finder. Hand tight in a collet so it'll slide up in case of accident. Slide it back and forth and when it hits it'll stop moving.

 

EDIT: Well, not always. I started doing it that way a few years back. Edge finder is already in there for X and Y, figured use it for Z too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been away for a few days and I am glad to see some more discussion on this. By my thinking there is a "actual" length for each tool. No matter if this length is obtained offline on a presetter, at the machine, or by some other means there is still only one correct "actual" value. I understand the point of view that of its used on one machine and the "error" is relative and its not 5 axis work that it won't really cause a problem, but its just not the way I like to do things. I belive I will mount up a .5" gage pin and go to the CMM probe the cone in the holder and create a plane at the 1.75" diameter. It will be easy enough to accuratly measure the disatnce from this plane to the end of the gage pin. I will look at picking up a master setting gage or a test bar, but with the CMM method we wouldn't have to purchase anything to try this out. Thanks to all of you who chimed in. I'll let you know how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

I did end up doing this with our VM3 and had good success. There was a significant difference between the spindle face measurement taken at the machine yielded and what the precision approach of going thru the gage pin/CMM steps yielded. I believe it was around .075". I had the exact # written down to post on here but lost it somewhere along the way. So basically what I did was.

-

1) Mount gage pin in a good quality holder.

2) Go to CMM and measure cone of the CAT40 taper, and measure the end plane of the gage pin. Create a theoretical intersection between the CAT40 cone and a theoretical plane @ the 1.75'' diameter location of the cone. The "gage" length of this tool assembly is the distance between the theoretical cone/plane intersection and the end plane of the gage pin.

3) Go to the machine and calibrate using this number.

-

If you don't have a standard or a test bar this works great to accurately calibrate your on machine tool touch off devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...