Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Threadmill NPT


Thoob
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I'm having a little issue here trying to get my mill to cut Internal NPT threads properly. To start off I want to say what I drew my geometry at. Its for a 1"-11.5 NPT The top of the hole is drawn at 1.175 and it tapers down at 1.7833 degrees. This part is no problem. The threadmill is a custom tool. I verified the diameter and it is correct when backplotting. I have the threadmill geometry set at "entity" and selected the 1.175" chain. I have .059" in the allowance overcut parameter. Run the part, its undersize. I had to adjust .039" in my compensation per side to get to the proper depth. This tells me that the tool is defined bigger than actual size and therefore cutting undersize however as mentioned, I verified that the tool is at the right diameter when backplotting. Problem with checking everything is the fact the thread is tapered. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Anyone who does NPT's on a mill, can you let me know how you do it? Thanks.

 

I have a zip2go available if someone wants to check it out for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the geometry drawn at 1.175

The Major if you add the thread depth comes to 1.293.

.059 for thread depth x 2 = .118 plus 1.175 = 1.293.

I got that number from ThreadPal.

Column 2 on your chart only states what the OD is on the pipe. It doesn't give any indication of what the geometry should be drawn at, which isn't the problem anyway. I have to figure out why the thread is cutting so small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do draw the custom tool profile, and use the diameter at the tip (the diameter of the thread form closest to the tip). That's the cut diameter that the cutter manufacturers specify. I've been using column 2 as the major, and we're checking the holes with gauges, and they're coming out. I never use a circle as geometry, I always use a point and specify diameter by number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Not exactly sure what you mean by tip. The cutter diameter is .854. Obviously the cutter is not perfectly sharp. If I draw it to be sharp(assuming this is what you mean), then the actual diameter of the tool would be wrong?

 

Are you using a tool with only one threadform? If so, use the actual diameter of that threadform. If it's more, like mine which have about a dozen arranged at the proper taper, use the diameter of the threadform closest to the tip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't fully understand what you are saying. The tool is one threadform. It does a range of 12-24 TPI. I know the NPT in question is 11.5 TPI and I have adjusted the depth to compensate for it.

I double checked the tool and it is drawn to a point (my mistake from my earlier post) So from the center of the tool to the "tip" of the tool is measuring .427"

The other issue here is that I cut a straight thread shortly after I did the NPT and the offset only needed to be adjusted .006. So this tells me the tool is defined properly. I am wondering, do I have a mistake in the thread depth? What is the Single Depth for a 1"-11.5 NPT?

 

 

EDIT - I assumed it was .059. This apparently is not correct according to a few charts I looked at. Assume we use your number from Column 2 which says 1.315 and that the pipe face (md) is 1.1725 (this is correct for this 1" NPT thread), then that makes my single depth .071. If I minus .059 from that, it gives me .012 difference. This is ok however I was originally .039 out so this still leaves me with .027 of unknown. lol. This is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok. See that is where I was different. I don't draw the MD like that. I actually drew the md and then added a number in the overcut allowance.

I did it with an endmill as you suggested vs the way I did it, and its funny the code is indeed different. Does the allowance overcut actually work different than how I think it does?

The way I drew the 2 was the 2nd side like you said, then the first side by drawing the pipe face(md) 1.175" and then putting an overcut of .0665. This technically should equal the same 1.175+.0665+.0665 = 1.308 but the code it outputs is different. See picture.

filecompare_zpsd5f62a6b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...