Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Tom Anderson

Verified Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tom Anderson

  1. Daniel, thank you for testing this! It is nice to be able to continue practicing on something AND be able to try features of a new version. I'll give it a try.
  2. Is it possible to open previous HLE files with a newer version? THX
  3. We are having trouble when trying to nest parts with geometry at different depths. It works fine if the parts exist in the file you are nesting in and you use “Add chained parts”. But if you nest by adding parts from external files using “Add parts from file”, then it projects all geometry to the same Z height. Bug? Thanks,
  4. Does anyone know where the default X6 Config file comes from on Windows 7 64bit install? When a new user launches X6 it automatically creates all the foldes and default files in -> Users\Username\My Documents\my mcamx6\Config\. I found this folder here -> C:\Program Files\mcamx6\common\UserDefaults\CONFIG, but there is no default.config in there. We want to setup a defualt config file for all users to start with. Thanks,
  5. After reading Colin's post it makes me wonder even more, why have a File Copy of the Mdef, rather than just a Disk Copy? Seriously, I can strip block numbers in the editor after posting much faster than editing the local Mdef. So, there has got to be more compelling reasons to have to go through all the Mdef updating and replacing. But I can't think of any right now (ok it's early) . What are there others that you would regularly need to change from file to file? Maybe we aren't taking advantage of those here, but it seems that a machine is a machine. If I add a rotary axis to my machine, and then to my Mdef, it should automatically be available to any MCX file, whether old or new, that uses this machine. I think the problem may be that "occasional options" like sequence numbers, are too tied up in the Mdef. Some settings should be in the config file, and some as the Mdef default ,with an option switch to change these from the default on the fly. Examples:(1)drafting settings are global. But as soon as I create a drafting entity, I can modify it. This doesn't change the global drafting settings, and doesn't require me to load a new set of global drafting settings to accomplish. (2)Mdef/Cdef settings you can change on the fly after it is loaded; "Output MCX file descriptor", Misc reals/integers, NC file path, tool library. I'll have to find my list of Mdef/Cdef defaults you can't change without editing teh Mdef, but should be able to. Not whining, just wanting to help keep Mcam in the lead of functionality.
  6. We have the same frustration. You fix or improve one thing in your MDef, and then you have to remember to replace it in every file from now on. And in two months maybe I'm replacing it on file are already did. No way to tell if you have the latest one. Never was really sure why the MDef gets copied into the MCX. The post doesn't get copied in. So, if you make changes to the post, you don't have to do anything to get those changes to take effect. Just post and go. ONE master copy of the MDef would do the same. I might suggest this enhancement. A config setting with several options: Update Mdef on file open Always Ask Never
  7. Also, it looks like your using X4. With X4 users can trade off sharing licenses by switching using the Settings > NetHASP Licensing. You can grab and release solids, multi-axis, etc. To switch the base license, there must one available to switch to. It will tell you if it cannot switch.
  8. Looks good so far. Still exploring all the new stuff, and where all the old stuff is.
  9. Thanks for the input guys. The problems are random, so I think we'll track it to see how many many before we decide what action to take. It is just crazy that a file opens on C:McamX4 install and not on Program FilesMcamX4 install!!!! Still waiting for word from CNC as to a fix or work-around. My guess is the answer will be "it works in the next version". Heard that before? Hopefully, since X5 default will be to install in Program Files :fingers crossed: Or, we'll have to go back and re-install on 70 PCs. I suggested to our dealer I would do that and then deduct the time cost from our annual maintenance . . . . . . . . . . still waiting for a response. So pass it on: DO NOT INSTALL MASTERCAM X4 IN C:PROGRAM FILES No matter that the X4 Administrator's Guide says you can.
  10. X4 launches and runs fine for the most part. The problems are specific to this one file (at the moment), opens only on C:McamX4 instalation. My concern is if this will become more of a problem.
  11. Yes, we have followed the guidelines in the X4 Administrator’s Guide for installing in C:Program FilesMcamX4 and setting user permissions(pg34). I am an Admin on my PC and this file still will not open. But will open on a C:McamX4 instalation. IT dept scripted the setting of permissions on the Program FilesMcamX4 folder, I will talk to them about setting it through GPO.
  12. Does anyone else have X4 installed in program files? If yes have you experienced any problems? Here's the story. We have installed X4 in program files for all our users (over 70). One user recently had a problem with a file crashing on file open. I tested it on my PC, and it crashes here also. Event log has this < Message >MSVCR90.dll caused an Access Violation (0xc0000005) in module MSVCR90.dll at 001b:7855b00a.< /Message > I sent the file to the Mcam dealer who says it opens just fine. I then tried it on another PC here with X4 installed at C:McamX4, an it opens fine. So it appears directly related to where X4 is installed. WTH? The latest word from Mcam dealer is " CNC says X4 doesn't realy like to be installed in Program Files directory..." Anyone else heard of this? It doesn't cause problems all the time, but we can't have files get hosed at random, and we really can't go redo 70+ installs. I'm looking for a fix or work-around.
  13. I don't want to beat this to death . . . ok, well maybe. We have the "work arounds" and can pay attention to how it is posting out. My biggest interest in this, is finding out if there is a better solution for the future. So here is the question: Can we set file paths, file names, nci files, etc., NOW in X4 files, so that when we open an X4.mcx in X5(or future version), add operations and post, we get ONE NC FILE for old and new ops?
  14. We would want to keep the option for different NC file names. I would just like Mastercam to play nicer when old and new OPs are included with the same name. Where does Mastercam store the nci path info that makes it think they are different? When I right-click > edit selected > change NC file name, old(X2) and new(X4) ops all say "C:Program FilesMcamX4MillNCT.NC", but the underlying nci path is obviously different. Somehow "changing" the NC file name(even though they are already the same) sets the nci path to the same.
  15. quote: . . make sure you have "Ask" checked & Turn on "Use last Operation's NC File name". Yes, I have everything set this way, so new ops are named the same and I do get a warning that I am about to overwrite the previous NC file. I even get this message when I open an older mcx file "Machine Group: Machine Group-2 NC data path has been updated to: C: PROGRAM FILESMCAMX4NC". But it will still post the temp nci file to the old nci data path. This produces different nc files if I add new ops.
  16. I’m resurrecting this old thread because I didn’t find any recent chatter on this issue. If I missed it please post a link. So here’s the scenario . . . [*]Open X2.mcx in X4 [*]Add operations [*]Post. Mastercam posts two .NC files with the same name, to the same location, with second one overwriting the first. [*]Check NC File name on old and new ops. All are the same. BUT, we know this happens because the NCI path for old and new ops are different, so . . . . . . . [*]Select all ops, Right-click > Edit Selected operations > Change NC File name So in reality, “Change NC File name” really means “Change NCI Destination” like it use to say in pre-X versions. Right? So how do we stop the madness of manually updating this every time we open an older file and add ops? [*]Only ever install Mastercam in C:mcamx so that all nci destinations are the same? Not practical IMO to dump an old version and test&switch to a new version in same day. [*]Choose a different nci destination that can be common no matter what Mcam version is used in the future? Such as C:Temp instead of C:mcamX#Millnci? I hoped this is what would happen if you select “Use Windows temp directory” in Config>Files > Data Path, along with not saving the NCI file. Technically then the NCI is a temp file. No such luck. Any other suggestions??
  17. What is happening is, if we specify the /M1 by command line switch, but no Mill1 is available, it rolls over to an available Mill license? Like Mill3? That's why I was hoping to use "/M1 /NoM3"
  18. Thought I'd add another question to this OLD thread. Can you use command line switches to retrict a user from a level of a certain type of license? For instance can we use /NoM3 to prevent a user from getting a level Mill3?
  19. Is there a way to change the location of a Solids Layout so that it is not on the construction origin? I can move the views around once they are created, but then they fall outside the 'paper size' rectangle drawn by Mastercam. I'm hoping there is an 'origin' button or something I'm missing. Like when you do a File Merge/Pattern. Thanks,
  20. quote: Modify or add the following line in your PST file. rpd_typ_v7$ : 0 V7?? That's a reason not to updating posts from old, old versions of Mastercam. You should get a fresh copy of MPMaster and start there!
  21. Sorry to here of all the problems. Everything is looking good here. XP Pro SP2 NVidia Quadro Can you duplicate the problems on an X4 sample part file? Something that others could specifically try also, to compare?
  22. Oh, and yes Colin, I did have more than one tool in my program. But, I have made that mistake before . . . . more than once! Programmer error not post error.
  23. Thanks guys. I finally got the output, using James' suggestion was easiest way. In the process I did some more searching/testing and found this. Since it is different then pre-X versions it had me confused. Thought I'd pass it along for others. The "enable staged tool routines" checkbox in the CDef = bldnxtool$ used in pre-X posts. So, if bldnxtool$ = 0, first_tool$ & next_tool$ is not assigned a value. Then, when bldnxtool$ = 0,forcing *first_tool$ produces the T0. It's just onther one of those things that was moved from the .pst to the MDef/CDef, but not named the same, so ya have figure what it is. Recommended reference McamX4 NCI Parameter Ref.pdf !!!
  24. I've used the X4 Mpmaster.pst as the base for a custom post. I'm trying to get the first tool call at the end of the file, but this machine does not support staging tools. So, I have: > Control Def. "enable stage tool routines" = off > this line in peof = pbld, n$, first_tool$, protretinc, e$ I get NO first tool output. If I force first tool(*first_tool$) I get T0 . If I turn on tool staging in the control def, I get T# output at every tool change, which I can’t have. Am I crazy(ok don't answer that), missing something here, or does mpmaster not track first_tool$ if tool staging is off? Thanks,

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...