X7 Processes paths faster than X9

[Thee Rickster ™]

I have the latest X9 update installed BTW

 

I had an ECN yesterday on a complex 14 insert program on an insert plate to suit.

 

 i put all the new inserts in X7, re-selected all the geometry and hit save

 

For Shats and giggles....

I opened the file in X9(took 3 times longer to open even with those paths dirty)

and side by side i re-genned the paths starting the X9 first then the X7.

 

The X7 took about 12 minutes and the X9 took 16 minutes.

 

Is anyone else noticing X9 processing slower?

Is there a setting to fix this? i will go try the bench mark some time and compare

eventually...... but this is a similar test

 

 

 

 

Thanks in advance

Rick

[specv]

Rickster, 

your title says the opposite of your post. I have not tried this but I don't have x7 installed anymore. I could try x8 and see if there is the same issue.

[DanielGingras]

I have changed the title to reflect the post content

[Thee Rickster ™]

 Thank you Sir!
 

[gcode]

wild guess.

you built the file in X7.. so the X7 regen files already exist in your X7 temp folder

it was a first time for X9 so it had to create the files first which took longer.

If this is true, subsequent X9 regens should run much faster than the initial 16 minute run

 

and something to look at

System Config/Toolpaths/Memory buffering.. are X7 and X9 set to the same values?

[Thee Rickster ™]

wild guess.

you built the file in X7.. so the X7 regen files already exist in your X7 temp folder

it was a first time for X9 so it had to create the files first which took longer.

If this is true, subsequent X9 regens should run much faster than the initial 16 minute run

 

and something to look at

System Config/Toolpaths/Memory buffering.. are X7 and X9 set to the same values?

interesting on regen/ temp files

 

Why is it not the same when re-genning the benchmark test?

(i have had that file saved dirty since benchmark thread started)

 

I do side by side (config) detailed copying.

 

just checked and buffering is identical

[Thee Rickster ™]

just retested the benchmark file in X7 and X9

 

cleared both temp folders first

 

X9 sagged like an old mans Moobs compared to X7... lol

 

WORK p.c.

i7 3770k @3.50ghz
32 gig ram
64bit
quadro k4000

SSD

 

 

X7- 38 seconds

 

X9 - 1min 12 seconds

 

wow

[Thee Rickster ™]

x7 verify (default s settings) also clearer than X9..

 

Is there any way to fix that?

 

.

X7

.

 

.

X9

 

.

[Newbeeee™]

X10 Rick, X10...

 

edit: sagging like an old mans moobs ROR

[gcode]

^{One more thing to look at}

^{Launch the Multihtreading Manager and make sure both X7 and X9 are using the same number of cores}

[Thee Rickster ™]

^{One more thing to look at}

^{Launch the Multihtreading Manager and make sure both X7 and X9 are using the same number of cores}

same

[Thee Rickster ™]

.