Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

bird2010

Verified Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    87

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by bird2010

  1. bird2010
    Maybe there is a better one...I think it's not perfect (the first and last depths, the step amount are different, the results are different) Using the contact point algorithm, the calculation results are not completely accurate at the edge?! Unified's algorithm will be more accurate...
  2. bird2010
    There is a misjudgment problem when using Ctrl+Shift+clic for hollow solids...unless you are willing to split the solids! When this problem occurs when using Ctrl+Shift+clic, I will not cancel or reselect, but directly use the mouse window to select the unnecessary holes (it may take 2 times, because the first time will select all the holes in the range, the second time It takes 2 times to cancel all holes) I'm used to doing it this way...I also want to know other good ways!?
  3. bird2010
    Maybe.... (very small R).....or blade type
  4. bird2010
    Sorry, my English is not good. I don’t understand what you mean? Your stock is wrong, I did not use it, because 2 times using 3D high-speed Contour does not require the use of stock! Just control the depth...the focus is on the use of the tool Use END MILL or END MILL BULL (very small R).... I only created another stock to simulate using it. I think the simulation results are acceptable... But there is a problem of docking accuracy... It may be necessary to set the reserve amount separately for individual surfaces to avoid overcutting the previously processed surfaces...
  5. bird2010
    ...
  6. bird2010
    Using 3D high-speed Contour Use END MILL or END MILL BULL (very small R) Maybe there is a better way...
  7. bird2010
    Hi Aaron... 2024....I don’t have time to switch to English ...sorry!
  8. bird2010
    This is the pride of Mastercam! Since I started using v9.1, it has existed functions, and it is very suitable for some occasions (electrode) But the high-speed Contour does not incorporate this function...it is a pity
  9. bird2010
    2024 supports operations to save multiple templates...
  10. bird2010
    You are right, this distance can be controlled by parameters and can be adjusted according to needs. good!
  11. bird2010
    Add curve control.....old 3d Contour....
  12. bird2010
    I think it means me,....yes, 2024 can
  13. bird2010
    Here are my thoughts... 2D---5X swarf---5X swarf, not using Unified Maybe there is a better way
  14. bird2010
    Multi-axis tool paths cannot output arc codes. If the machine can effectively run linear codes, it will be smoother to change the tool advance and retreat methods.
  15. bird2010
    Check that your tool plane and comp plane are correct...
  16. bird2010
    When you use Pocketing without turning on Intermediate slices, do you have normal tool path generation? If so... could you screenshot some pictures of the tool paths? ...and pictures of the Intermediate slices parameters
  17. bird2010
    Using morph can be easily extended...
  18. bird2010
    If you don't want to spend a lot of money to upgrade to the latest version You can go to the dealer and try to ask them to ask their customers if they have an old version of HASP (no longer in use) Then buy it with cheaper money....this is one way
  19. bird2010
    Yes, tell the dealer and they will take care of it...but it will cost a lot of money, which means you still have to upgrade. The dealer said at the time that Hasp was obsolete and could not replace USB, and that it would cost money to upgrade the software license. (You cannot replace the old X5 Hasp with the X5 software license) The dealer said that it must be upgraded to the current release version, so the company updated everything The days of Hasp are over
  20. bird2010
    Yes, ModuleWorks Pocket does not seem to have a specified entry point option at the moment (hopefully there will be in the future) But currently it automatically calculates a reasonable path! If the calculation result is unreasonable, you can check or re-establish the bottom driving surface
  21. bird2010
    Bottom driving surface problem, rotate it or re-establish it to avoid the "position" of the "hidden" boundary line of the surface Make it not exist (if it is a 360-degree surface, there is no way to eliminate it, it must be there, you can only change the position) I don't know the English meaning, but my understanding is this...
  22. bird2010
    Test... I still think it is more efficient to not withdraw if it is reasonable. It was only withdrawn after the second deep cut... Optimization...Solidcam was completed a few years ago, Tebis was completed only recently How long do you have to wait for Mastercam?....You all want to be satisfied with the status quo and not move forward?! Those who do not support please do not throw water, but those who support please speak out Even if I am hated by everyone, I still have to say what needs to be said...
  23. bird2010
    Sorry !
  24. bird2010
    After bringing it in, you can try use Mastercam’s decompose entity function
  25. bird2010
    I don’t know if future versions will have the possibility of adding cutting from the outside? (Hard materials) Now it can only be created manually

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Useful Links

Contact Info

Subscribe to eMastercam News

 

Legal

Privacy Policy

Store Terms & Conditions

Forum Guidelines

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...