Mastercam verification limitation

[Aeroguy]

Oh no...... Dam, that get yanked already?

 

What got yanked fast ?

[MAM J]

I agree to an extent, however when you are talking about complex multi-axis motion then the rules change to a degree. The calculations the post is doing becomes far more integrated into the code and the need to see this when you are talking about a high dollar piece of material becomes rather important. I use CATIA day in and day out and Mastercam now only some of the times, but regardless of the CAM system I would never... ever release a program to the floor without running Vericut.

 

For me it is a matter of speed and mistake proofing. While those quirky CAM issues that cause issues do exist... 99% of the mistakes that could potentially make it to the floor are my own. They come from a lack of understanding what the software is doing as well as having my head up my... oh wait.. it was operator error.

 

 

HaHaHa This made me laugh, but I 100% agree with you on all levels. We run our post through camplete. Best money ever spent, especially when the machine is worth 10 years wages!!

[Thee Rickster ™]

99%of the mistakes that could potentially make it to the floor are my own

 

They come from a lack of understanding what the software is doing

 

Couldn't agree less, for me, but I guess that is just my own opinion.

Never had to worry about software putting out bad code pre - MC.

So far I have not had bad code from MC as of yet.

Was Vericut created for X versions of MC?

[MotorCityMinion]

"What got yanked fast ?"

 

Joan made an appearance. It wasn't on here 2 minutes.

 

 

[Newbeeee™]

"What got yanked fast ?"

 

Joan made an appearance. It wasn't on here 2 minutes.

 

Oh c'mon. It's Crimbo. Good will to all men and that

I kinda miss his ramblings

[Guest]

I kinda miss his ramblings

 

They are available elsewhere if you really want to read them.

[Guest CNC Apps Guy 1]

I kinda miss his ramblings...

I kinda miss chicken pox...