Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

CEMENTHEAD

Verified Members
  • Posts

    359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by CEMENTHEAD

  1. On 4/12/2024 at 10:06 AM, Aaron Eberhard said:

    I don't have a file handy, but did you make wireframe around your cylinder, use UnWrap on it to get a flat pattern, toolpath that and then just use Axis Sub inside of the toolpath?

    We tried both ways, posts 90 deg off. Transform rotate sends it to Zero deg. 

  2. Would anyone have an example they would like to share, We have a cylinder with bosses, I'm spending way too much time trying to remember how I did this before.

    can't share the file, but think of a birdfeeder shape.

     images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQOJ_0366O1NGm9ezRAU2k

    there was nothing I could find on the tech exchange.

  3. Did some work for "a biG powEr plant". they outsourced the castings from India. There were noticeable ball bearings and other unconfirmed hard spots inside. Nightmare to machine. NDT failed all 6 parts. These were Ø4' X 5' long, bosses on ends were Ø2' X 8.0".  We kept the snake we found in one of the crates in the programming office ( in a terrarium) for like 3 months before the office girls found out. 

    • Like 2
    • Haha 3
  4. We did this once. on our VG5000's a few years back,  Machine inspection send back was good but comparing to CMM was off a bit. Machine error will reflect on inspection in the machine. We were able to duplicate it. a few tenths off.  We can't trust that.

    All inspections are now still done in inspection. You can make a lot of scrap checking a part with a machine that is out. We ball bar ours twice a year, but yeah if your gauges  are off, and inspection uses them to check a part, it's still going to be off. 

    IMHO don't do that.

  5. 11 minutes ago, cruzila said:

    We are doing a part that is A36. The previous times we used 1018CDA huge difference in getting material to not tear on the corners.

     

    I always finish the minor diameter with an endmill prior to plunging the tool onto the part, some people think undersize is better for drag on the tool, less chatter. But I go slow with molly-D and It's been quite successful in everything from A36 to 316L only cutting the critical area and thread milling after, taps are a nightmare. And don't forget most port tool spot faces are only required on unmachined surfaces. If you mill the face prior only a SF dusting is needed. 

    • Like 3
  6. 18 hours ago, RustyG said:

    Does anyone have an easy way to model internal threads on solids?  External as well? Trying the sweep around a helix and it seems very finnicky. Any help appreciated. Thank you 

    Import a Cap Screw matching your thread size from McMaster-Carr, Place it, Boolean remove it. Easiest way IMHO. 

    • Like 6
  7. I've cheated this before by making an opposite rad surface toolpath on the inside with the bottom of the tool, and let the back of the tool cut the part. 

    I'd load a picture but my "max total size" is set for 1.45 kB.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...