Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

o/t pocket ste over


DavidB
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

What are your thoughts on step over amount when machining a pocket in sttel with a tipped tool?

 

I had a program running a 20mm Dia Iscar (3 inserts) with a 40% of Dia (9mm) stepover at 2mm deepth.The Sandvik Rep sore it and said the standard should be 75%-80% cutter Dia because at 40% cutter Dia there is only 1 tooth in contact with job?

 

Thx in advance cheers.gif

 

What do u guys think about step over amount???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thad,

 

Its a question about stepover and what users think and use for tipped tools.Its not a querry on Mastercam, so I did not want to waste peoples time if they where not interested in helping about a Topic that is not realy a Mastercam question.

 

Hard to please everyone.

 

cheers.gifcheers.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL David yeah aint that the truth. I agree with the 70% step over on inserted tools. I think you might look at the way you are apporaching your pockets to get the clean up. If I am uaing an inserted cutter I apporach it tottally different than using endmills. Look at it this way have you ever paid attention to the load meter on a job if the tool has to take a full cut frist going into material. The area is half the cimcurfence of the cutter. It you have a .787" cutter you have 1.236" of cutter surface touching the part with .0787" of depth giving you alot of area where the 3 inserts can do the job. If you feed rate is 2000 mm/m then your feed rate per rev is 1mm per rev on 2000 rpm. A good amount of Material being removed. Now if you are only doing 40% stepover you are then getting .7416" of surface area at the same feed rate then in all acutally you still get the same feed per rev but you get alot less material removal and less efficent use of the inserts and tool. I hope that made sense.

 

HTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice O/T ,David !

I prefer stepover 65 % for inserts without radius or hog mills

For inserts with radius it depends of many factors ,bigger stepover for little downsteps .

I mostly never use for pocketing nothing except bull nose insets (round insert ) they help to make job 3-5 faster with less spindel load ,even if the douwstep is 0.5 mm or less especially for extra deep pockets (cooling with air on the mold steels )Seco tools like this tools.jpg

I use taper angle option in depth cuts ,it makes automatically taper angle on the pocket to rid of additional friction on the pocket corners (3-5 degrees enough )

For hard load critical works I leave 1-2 mm spare material ,it helps if tool breakage happens or detail moves a bit .

I mostly never finish walls with the same tool .

Take note that doing taper angle the result depends were your geometry is (on what height )

 

HTH

WTHH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...