Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

How to surface this part?


Darin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

 

Is there a way to use a full radius slotting mill to surface this part? It has a under cut radius.. Or would it have to be 5 axis or 4 axis positioning to make this? The part is small only 1 1/4" long and the radius are .020 and 1 mm.... I know I can have a special form tool made but it is $500 and they don't want to spend that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this tool from Harvey:

 

http://www.harveytoo...utters_134.aspx

 

I'd get this tool and use a surface finish contour toolpath or similar. Of course 5-axis would make it easy with standard ball mills.

 

Great thanks that tool should work.. But the problem is to get Mastercam to work with that tool... I have had no luck yet.. It just acts like the under cut part is straight 90....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried a flowline toolpath? With that tool it should be no problem. Or as Bob said a contour will work as well.

 

 

Great thanks those worked... I was trying to use surface high speed tool paths..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

make sure you disable gouge checking (2 places in MC) to be able to get under the part.

 

programmed a couple 5 axis holes on a 3ax knee mill for a vendor last week. thanks to Harvey tool, it worked like a charm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

make sure you disable gouge checking (2 places in MC) to be able to get under the part.

 

programmed a couple 5 axis holes on a 3ax knee mill for a vendor last week. thanks to Harvey tool, it worked like a charm.

 

When you say gouge setting you mean here? In the gap setting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once you've disabled the Gouge Checks, you'll need to use "direction" to give you a lead in/out move to your cut. Otherwise you risk retracting while your tool is in the undercut, and scrapping the part.

 

Surface Finish Contour is another toolpath that supports undercuts...

can we come up with a more obscure name for surfacing lead in/out?

instead of "direction" let's call it.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like an explanation of exactly how the direction setting gets it's coordinates. Because every time I use it I think I know which direction I need to lead-in from and I always have to change it.

 

I use "Direction" more often than not. Like a lot of things Mastercam,

it kinda sorta works. Not sure how to explain it, but if you experiment

a little it'll make sense eventually. Coming from other software, the

ability to fully control engages / retracts is something I really miss.

 

Here's how I set my default "Direction" settings:

 

 

 

Sorry to drag this thread further off topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone ever used Photoshop? When you setup a blending option like a drop shadow there is a simple to use little dial (like a clock) that you use to tell it the direction the light is coming from. You can enter in polar coordinates. Would be very nice if Mastercam worked the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone ever used Photoshop? When you setup a blending option like a drop shadow there is a simple to use little dial (like a clock) that you use to tell it the direction the light is coming from. You can enter in polar coordinates. Would be very nice if Mastercam worked the same way.

funny you should mention that. MC used to use a direction dial here. pre x IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone ever used Photoshop? When you setup a blending option like a drop shadow there is a simple to use little dial (like a clock) that you use to tell it the direction the light is coming from. You can enter in polar coordinates. Would be very nice if Mastercam worked the same way.

 

That would be appropriate if "Relative to" is specified as "Tool Plane X axis", not so much for "Cut Direction".

 

Think of "Tool Plane X axis" as an absolute value, "Cut Direction" as incremental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be appropriate if "Relative to" is specified as "Tool Plane X axis", not so much for "Cut Direction".

 

Think of "Tool Plane X axis" as an absolute value, "Cut Direction" as incremental.

 

Ok, so thinking along those lines using Tool Plane X Axis a value of 180 would be an approach from the left. But in my sample program it comes from the right. Just the opposite of what I thought it would be. Why is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so thinking along those lines using Tool Plane X Axis a value of 180 would be an approach from the left. But in my sample program it comes from the right. Just the opposite of what I thought it would be. Why is that?

 

180 is an approach TO the left, not from. 0 deg = X+ engage, 90 deg = Y+ engage, 180 deg = X- engage, 270 = Y- engage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...