Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Inconel problem


Recommended Posts

I have been given the task of trying to make this inconel bracket. It's current state is that it has been EDM'd to shape leaving .010" per side to remove the recast layer. The part is roughly 6" x 3", heat treated inco  to about 45 rc. The part is .170" thick, with a bend about 2 " in on the long end at approx. 48 deg. I'm trying to cut about .010" off the bigger surface, and everything I try is just warping the part. I attached a file so you can see it. It was not my idea to leave the .01 stock all over, but it is proving to be a nightmare. The change to the process was made by an office manager with no consideration to what would follow. It's a long story but apparently I drew the short straw.............

 

So far I've been trying to hold it in a vise, using different face mills, 1.25", 2.0", and 3.0".  Any ideas would be appreciated.

51 m for forum.mcx-9

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might want to try using a smaller dia. solid carbide end mill, 1/2" or so. Try running it at 100 to 140 surface feet feeding at about .002 per tooth. a small corner radius up to .015" will keep the corner from breaking down too quickly. Don't go with too large of a radius or heat may build up and cause warping and /or work hardening. We have had good luck with this approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

should have wired it right to size

Well that is kind of how we ended up where I am now. The part used to be wired right to size, however that was without the customers knowledge. It worked well, but EDM was not allowed. They did it anyway ( this is before my time here) When the order came in again, the new Op Manager said we had to leave .010 because of the recast layer. All of this happened without any input from me. When the parts came back from EDM with .010 stock all over, it became my problem. Any process and fixtures we had basically went out the window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that is kind of how we ended up where I am now. The part used to be wired right to size, however that was without the customers knowledge. It worked well, but EDM was not allowed. They did it anyway ( this is before my time here) When the order came in again, the new Op Manager said we had to leave .010 because of the recast layer. All of this happened without any input from me. When the parts came back from EDM with .010 stock all over, it became my problem. Any process and fixtures we had basically went out the window.

 

That's why they get the big bucks.  They get you to work harder.  The more they see you struggle, the more they think they are getting the most out you.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inconel is pretty thermally stable, isn't it?

Are they that tight of tolerance that heat treating is required prior to machining?

 

At the old job shop I was at, we made these Stainless steel parts about 2"x2" that were basically a hog out, that had some small (.0781) intersecting bores.

The owner used to get the cut stock blocks heat treated prior to machining, just because that's the way they had always done it.

 

I had a hunch one day and ran an untreated part and oversized one of the holes to ID it, then sent it in with the next batch of stock to be heat treated.

 

Owner got pissed when he found out that I did that, but after we inspected my part, we started heat treating post maching ops.

 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inconel is pretty thermally stable, isn't it?

Are they that tight of tolerance that heat treating is required prior to machining?

 

At the old job shop I was at, we made these Stainless steel parts about 2"x2" that were basically a hog out, that had some small (.0781) intersecting bores.

The owner used to get the cut stock blocks heat treated prior to machining, just because that's the way they had always done it.

 

I had a hunch one day and ran an untreated part and oversized one of the holes to ID it, then sent it in with the next batch of stock to be heat treated.

 

Owner got pissed when he found out that I did that, but after we inspected my part, we started heat treating post maching ops.

 

?

In my experience SS is nicer to machine AFTER its been heat treated, specially the precipitation heat treated ones.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...