Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Namliek_J@TheeCircle™

Verified Members
  • Posts

    423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Namliek_J@TheeCircle™

  • Birthday 06/21/1984

Uncategorized

  • Location
    15644

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Namliek_J@TheeCircle™'s Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

31

Reputation

  1. I program using HyperMill every day and to me MasterCam does not come close to comparing to it. I used to beta test for MasterCam and used it for the first 10 years I was in the business starting with Version 9. The main reason, STABILITY!!!! When I programmed in MasterCam I would deal with the software crashing on me daily. It was constantly locking up, forcing shut downs and causing me to loose work and spend extra time programming because of this reason. For the work I do now, which is all 5 axis (both 3+2 and full 5 axis) HyperMill works very well. It is on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. The tool collision monitoring and checking in HyperMill is top notch as well. Sure there are things I wish it would do that MasterCam would do and vice versa, but there will never be one single software out there that will do everything you need the exact way you want it to be done.
  2. I use HyperMill everday and program nothing but impellers. It is top notch for this type of work. I program both hub style and cover style impellers with it, full 5 axis machining and 3+2 machining. It is expensive but worth every penny IMO. HyperMill is very stable also. I have had one software crash in the last year of running the software where I was not able to save and lost work.
  3. I make it a point to recheck everything that gets reposted, doesnt matter if I have done so 100 times. If you would have simply sent the old code out, then that is one thing. But to open it up in a different version, repost, and send it out without any type of checking...... well you see where that got you. Bet you dont ever make that mistake again. Sucks that you may have to replace a spindle, but taking a couple extra minutes to check it out first would have been a lot cheaper. And as I always says, VERICUT everything if you can.
  4. I just crashed. Completely shut down on me while doing a 5 axis impeller path. Not to bad though, thats the first time in a year of using Openmind HyperMILL that I had a crash that completely shut down the softare!!!!
  5. The problem with verifying in MasterCAM is that it is pre-post. Just because it looks good in MasterCAM verify doesn't mean it is going to work the same exact way after the code is posted. Best bet is to run some type of verification after posting such as Vericut if possible. Whats great about Vericut is that the code that I verify is the same exact code that goes into the machine.
  6. On the pocket table, there is a column for Pocket Type. The pockets are assigned to 1, which should be a fixed pocket. For some reason, its not working like it should.
  7. Vericut all the way. I am running it right now verifying some 5 axis paths for some impellers.
  8. We never had to do this before. We would simply load the tools and they would automatically be fixed to the pocket in the chain. I could do it this way to make it work, but would like to be able to assign a pocket and have it fixed automatically.
  9. If I google that I am getting a lot of stuff for the TNC 360. I will talk with the Heidenhain guys and see what they say.
  10. Hey guys, My machines are DMC 125 U duoBlock with the iTNC530 control. Last week, the operators had to preform a recovery on both machines and I believe that somehow a parameter got changed. Before the recovery, the machine would pull a tool from the tool chain and then put it back where it got it. If Tool 1 came from Pocket 1, the machine would put it back in Pocket 1 when doing a tool change. Now, the machine will put the tool back in the pocket where it grabs the next tool from. If Tool 1 comes out of pocket 1, and then we pull Tool 2, the machine will put Tool 1 in Pocket 2. This is going to eventually lead to a crash and I want to put it back to how it was. I want the tools to go back into the pocket they came from. Do any of you guys know how to fix this?? Thanks.
  11. Does the cycle need to be right after a TOOL CALL?? You can see from the program I put in as an example: Tool Call 1 Run Program Rotate C Run Program Rotate C Run Program Tool Call 2 . . . I would really like it to run like this: Tool Call 1 Run Program Tool Breakage Detection Rotate C Run Program Tool Breakage Detection Rotate C Run Program Tool Breakage Detection Tool Call 2 . . . If the tool breaks, I want to stop everything from running. Sorry if this is very elementary, I am new to the Heidenhain Conrtols and still getting acquainted with how they operate.
  12. Anybody here running Heidenhain Controls?? If so, does anybody have an example of a program with the tool breakage detection cycle in it?? Cycle 586?? Here is an example of my program. You can see where I would like to add the tool breakage detection cycle. Any help would be awesome. Thanks guys.
  13. CNC PRO, Depending on your machine, you can run that tool at very high speeds. I would start around 1000 SFM, and about .008 IPR and test it out. That gives you 7640 RPM @ 61 IPM. You can them up the speed and feed if you machine allows.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...