Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
When I open an existing project It ALWAYS defaults back to a certain color. How do I save this setting?
- Configuration wireframe color has no effect
- Plane color has no effect
I find opinfo much simpler to use than the old complicated mechanism for getting parameters.
Is there any drawback in mixing the two? I can't rewrite the post for opinfo fully, but instead start gradually using it more and more.
This is definitely something that should be doable in a custom DLL. We have different uses for the custom drill cycles and hard-coding movement pattern to them is not a good thing IMO, especially when there many variables even to a simple pecking cycle so you should then be able to adjust them all to get 100% proper backplot.
Hi and thanks.
This control doesn't seem to be new enough as those variables did not work. But after hours of digging, I finally found the proper ones:
X=#5341, Y=#5342, Z=#5343
(source: https://www.factorydaily.com/fdattachs/fdattachs7/112716211424392.pdf)
Any advice from a Mazatrol (M plus, 20 years old control) guru is most welcome.
The process is that we use probe to get the initial part zero and this is done in a Mazatrol prog. The Mazatrol prog then calls a sub that is made by Mastercam(tm). The problem is that I am not having much luck figuring out how to read the work offset data from the Mazatrol program at the EIA side. What system parameter(s) are the axis values stored?
(I know you can directly set those values in G54..G59 but that is not a solution here)
Sure there are many workarounds, but most of them count as hack in my book. Why not just remove the limit? We're not in 80s using 640KB of memory any more.
I think it's about time Mastercam started implementing plug-in architecture so that you could customize the GUI directly with your own dll's. Operations tree is the best (worst) example; I always find it outright messy and slow to use, being so congested with text the information gets easily lost in it. Even alternating background coloring of operations would help.
Time for a sanity check. I tested this this morning and thought it works, now after some modifications I get tool dia and radius same for every tool. I reverted back to the original code above and still the same.
Btw. is there a shortcut to "expand all regions" in Code Expert?
I have actually never had to use more than one post per machine definition. So, how do I un-gray "Select Post" button in the post dialog so that I won't have to change the post in machine definition to use it?
Edit: Apparently not possible.
None of our horizontal mills support dynamic work offset, that is, the work offset rotates automatically with the pallet. Because of this I have started implementing logic into my post that uses G55 as the source work offset and after each rotation, the rotated work offset is written into G56 that is used by every rotated plane. G54 is always (0,0,0) and thus reserved for center-of-rotation programming, meaning every single program prior to 2018.
The reason I am forced to do this is because probing is becoming very common it is a huge PIA to handle rotations with work offset corrections.
My thoughts as well. It is obviously good for the simpler things. Smoothcam as a name is pretty much not recognized by Google so maybe it is a name our local machine tools vendor made up.
I have not used the software but keep noticing that Integrex machinists in our shop keep falling back to Smoothcam even though we have Mill-Turn and I would of course prefer that everything was programmed in Mastercam (and not mix two different cam software). Is it so much easier and faster to use than MC? The problem is that operators come to me asking for drill point coordinates and drill vectors for Smoothcam programming and I have to provide them with printouts from MC.
I know Mill-Turn is not the easiest thing to learn, so how limited is Smoothcam when compared to MC?
It is better if you ever want to advance into learning the C-hook API. And personally, I dislike the syntax of Basic.
Knowing even one language of the C family tree is a big advantage.
I'm about to embark on the same quest. We have a document management system (M-Files) yet nobody uses it for what would be really useful. Controlling different Mastercam project versions!
Every answer seems to be praising a 3D mouse, but I did not manage to get used to one (SpaceNavigator), despite two weeks of effort, after which I gave up. It kept slowing me down too much so I always resorted back to mouse, otherwise it would have been impossible to get things done. The learning curve is very steep or I am getting too old.
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.