Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Problem with slot on 4th axis


jeff
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you have 5 Axis then you could Swarf them and use 4 Axis output also. You will have to use the old school swarf, because of two major things missing in the new swarf. #1 the ability to force only 4 Axis output #2 the ability to pick a start surface.

 

Using the Solid Surfaces didn't do what I wanted so I old schooled it with chains and got what I would want to run on a machine. Here is a link to the file.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/o88yym8upkcinn1/5th%20Axis%20XXX.mcam?dl=0

 

HTH

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I didn't mention on the chains was I converted the 3 entities for the top on one area into one spline because the bottom was 2 entities. It is where the bottom of the shape is a full radius and the top of the shape is 2 radius and one flat. In situations like this that is where Old School and sync by entity is a good approach. If you wanted to get real precise on the motion you could create points on each of the entities that would match top and bottom and the toolpaths would be really smooth motion also. Really a 5 Axis part not a 3 Axis part in one operation, but gets it close enough to call it good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try the Roll Die Chook. It is made for cutting with Axis Substitution, where the slot walls are offset from the centerline of the Rotary. The nice thing about Roll Die, is you don't need a Multi-Axis License. It works with 3X licenses.

I tried that. Reko's advice has given me the best results so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reko's process would cut the best part on a 4 Axis Machine. I was just giving you different ways to cut it in one shot.

Hi Ron, Your tool path actually violates the inside corner of the slot. There would need to be extra geometry created to swarf the modelled slot due to the way the walls taper to a point above the lower rail at that inside corner. So yet again we wish all designers were machinists !!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ron, Your tool path actually violates the inside corner of the slot. There would need to be extra geometry created to swarf the modelled slot due to the way the walls taper to a point above the lower rail at that inside corner. So yet again we wish all designers were machinists !!

 

Yes you are correct it does where a 5 Axis machine or breaking it up in 3+1 would be needed to make the best part possible. I was just throwing together a thought for others to review not that I would machine it that way sorry if anyone thinks that is the best approach on a 4 Axis from my example not meant in that regard.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...