Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

Absolute value VS. Incremental


haroldm
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys.

I was wondering, and i suppose this is a rookie question, but what exactly do these two values mean? For example, i am surfacing a small dome part, and i was forced to use a parallel tool-path (dont ask) smile.gif . So when the tool gets real deep, the machine slows down on the downward feed as it jumps over the hump., and that is what i am trying to change. Any suggestions would be appriciated, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haroldm,

 

Asolute values in the parameters are always in reference to the Origin (X0 Y0 Z0). Incremental in the operation parameters is related to the location of the selected geometry for the operation. These should not be confused with a G91 output in the code. Many new programmers are leary of using the Incremental because they associate that term with the G91 output. This term should read something like "From Geometry" or "From Chain".

 

For example, if you chain a contour on a 3-D wireframe that's at a -0.5" depth, Absolute value would have to be filled out to (-0.5) in the field. Selecting the same chain and using Incremental, set the value to (0.0) to get the toolpath to machine to the same depth of the chain. The output will still produce the proper depth (-0.5") but if the geometry is ever moved, the Incremental depth is associated to the chain and the depth value would not need to be changed before regenerating the operation. Also many contours could be done with the same tool in the same operation even if they are at differing depths.

HTH cheers.gif

 

P.S. This unfortunately has little or nothing to do with what you describe is happening at the machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

i cant use the filter option because our xxxxor does not accept it.

How does the machine know that you filtered it? I can see if the machine doesn't like arcs in planes other than XY, but other than that, it's all G code. Set your filter to arcs in the XY plane only and see if that works.

 

Also, it sounds like maybe you're drip feeding your program and there is data starvation, thus the slow down. confused.gif

 

Thad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about this guys..my material is 3.1 thick, i have set the feed plane to 3.2. Is there a way i can

get the tool to rapid down other than change the Feed number? I am getting a real slow downward feed and i was thinking maybe incremental vs absolute might be my problem? Thanks for the help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haroldm, do not change the plunge rate unless you are plunging too fast when you enter the stock on a plunge move.

 

On the para's page.

 

Set clearance to an absolute value.

Set retract to an absolute value.

 

Set feed plane to an INC value.

 

This will rapid down to feed plane instead of using the plunge rate.

 

Saving time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...