Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
I didn't mind it before X6....but as soon as I started using stock models + optirest it became a p.i.t.a. One change in an early toolpath results in many subsequent operations becoming dirty.
Have you ever tried to backplot a toolpath and accidentally hit this little gem of a button? When you are working with about a dozen stock models and optirest....not cool.
Minor improvement for X8? .......hint, hint, hint.
Google Ballizing.
I have used ball bearings (in aluminum) and they work really well. Put a program stop, load the ball bearing into the hole, and press it thru with the machine (used a dowel pin held in a collet chuck)
The normals are definitely screwed up...if I analyze any of the solid surfaces, the normal is pointing toward the center of the solid. If I try to flip the normal, it does not respond.
My only option at this point is to create surfaces from the solid and then flip all the surface normals....all 917 of them. Oh well
What is the quickest way to flip all my surface normals on a solid? The solid has approximately 900+ surfaces so I really don't feel like flipping each one individually. Any thoughts? a c-hook perhaps?
Thanks
are you running X7?
Uncheck drive surfaces in the geometry section of collision control and it will open up the field you are looking for. or create a whole new strategy
Focusing on dynamic toolpaths. There will be presentations along with cutting demonstrations on a few of the machines we have in our technology center. We have a QTS250 that will be doing dynamic turning and a couple of VCU 400s that will be doing dynamic milling toolpaths. Maybe a few more machines in the mix if we have the time.
There will be refreshments, opportunities to network and Q/A time with some of the folks at CNC Software.
The gears have already been set into motion. After discussion with a few people at CNC it was suggested (by CNC) that afternoon typically works best.. I've never been involved in anything like this before so I'm going to listen to the advice of someone who has.
I'm always open for suggestion. I completely understand if people can't take time off of work for this session....but I've also played hooky in the past for the sake of professional development.
I guess we will see what the turnout looks like and heed any and all constructive criticism.
Steep/shallow. Use Z depths to force the tool to start deeper? Just a thought.
or maybe break the part up into sections using containment boundaries?
I've run into this problem before...not sure if there is a real solution.
Typically caused by parameters. Several to look at....baud rate, parity, stop bits...etc..
Another thing to look at. Make sure there is no % in the heading of the program and also no spaces.
That clears it up.
I'm just running 2 sessions right now and recreating all my planes again.
Maybe in the future you will be able to translate everything together (geometry, WCS, planes)
Thanks to everyone who responded.
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.