Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
Yes..
Generally I use wireframe for this...depending on what I need to do, I may need to offset a chain to get a path to cut just as I want
Blend geometry will usually be open...not a closed bounday....though working between 2 diameters or a boundary and point alter that rule
Create geometry along both edges of the ramp...use those as your 2 chains
Make sure you chain them both going the same direction or the result won't be what you want.
JP-3D_FACE_EXAMPLE..mcam
I only have 2024 but a 1 surface blend will get it...there are likely 5 or 6 other ways I could get it done as well..
I wouldn't opt for a flat mill but a ball instead
There's a reason diamond turing machines cut in the millionths'...
Not knowing your application, I certainly won't say it can't be done but I do know in our application, regardless of how good the finish was, it wasn't close enough.
If that is a single solid, the Disassemble function will not work....it is designed for assemblies which are made up of multiple parts.
You will have to break it apart manually.
Optics, ugh....
It is such a specialized process.
I've milled surfaces, it wasn't for the lack of trying but they could never approach our diamond turning machines.
Think Red Dot type optics....
If they have their own proprietary abilities, make them prove it. If they can, as far as I'm concerned it would be a no brainer to use their stuff.
2 things come immediately to mind
Are you sure the settings your saving are pointing to the correct directory for 2024?
Are you using Microsoft One Drive? I just had to turn it off for one user because he was using it and it was resetting his config file every time he changed it.
It's a single turret, spindle spindle it looks like....
If no one is up to tweaking a generic post in, then yeah, one of the 3rd party offerings....In-House Solutions, Postability or looking at your location, if Cimquest is your reseller, they can do it as well
I see what you are pointing out...still useless for my use...doesn't understand G10 lines, doesn't understand how Mazak subprograms are called, doesn't understand the offset variables(#70001+), trouble with macros still becasue of the #999 limitation....
NCPlot has just worked for all that stuff....
Though both are going to get a lot less use with Vericut coming online after the start of the New Year...
I do thank you for pointing out that it does have "some" ability finally.
I don't know what to say...my programs for my HMC's ALL have macro statements, some have macros, all have multiple offsets, all have subprograms after the M30...
Maybe it's because it is a Mazak and they(Cimco) won't even backplot it properly....but none of what you said work for me and haven't worked for me since 2016 when we bought the full blown editor seat....that is the single reason we bought NCPlot because it just works for that.
You can open a window that will show it working through a macro and the values it is calculating...you can go one step at a time to watch the values update....it does not show tool movement for macros
Really, it depends....
You're likely also getting wireless devices that connect the machines, the software, a hardware hub(# of machines dependent) programming the devices, running all needed ..
If program control is not an issue, then nothing really matters....I know that once a program is proven and all worked out, getting that saved and backed up is vital
It has not been updated for sometime...we are running 2.34...I wouldn't even know what would need updating, it does about everything we bought it to do...
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.